ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024
Serum proteomic panel validated for prediction of knee osteoarthritis progression.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma Proteomics Reveals Persistent and Surgery-Responsive Molecular Signatures in Osteoarthritis Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biochemical biomarkers of knee osteoarthritis progression: Results from the FNIH biomarkers consortium progress OA study.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- Insights into knee post-traumatic osteoarthritis pathophysiology from the relationship of serum biomarkers to radiographic features in the ADVANCE cohort.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- Synovial fluid as a complex molecular pool contributing to knee osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- Emerging Diagnostic Approaches for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Advances in Imaging, Biomarkers, and Clinical Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Transformative approaches for effective clinical trials to reduce the disease burden of osteoarthritis.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2025Review
- Disease-Associated Signatures Persist in Extracellular Vesicles from Reprogrammed Cells of Osteoarthritis Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Osteoarthritis Year in Review 2024: Molecular biomarkers of osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2025Review
- Protective Effects of an Oligo-Fucoidan-Based Formula against Osteoarthritis Development via iNOS and COX-2 Suppression following Monosodium Iodoacetate Injection.Marine drugs · 2024Article
- An osteoarthritis pathophysiological continuum revealed by molecular biomarkers.Science advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To further validate a serum proteomics panel for predicting radiographic (structural) knee OA progression. Design: Serum peptides were targeted by multiple-reaction-monitoring mass spectrometry in the New York University cohort (n = 104). Knee OA progression was defined as joint space narrowing ≥1 in the tibiofemoral compartment of one knee per study participant over a 24-month follow-up. The discriminative ability of an 11-peptide panel was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), without and with demographic characteristics of age, sex, and body mass index. The association of each peptide with OA progression was assessed by odds ratios (OR) in multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for demographics. Results: The cohort included 46 (44%) knee OA progressors. The panel of 11 peptides alone yielded AUC = 0.66 (95% CI [0.55, 0.77]) for discriminating progressors from non-progressors; demographic traits alone yielded AUC = 0.66 (95% CI [0.55, 0.77]). Together the 11 peptides and demographics yielded AUC = 0.72 (95% CI [0.62, 0.83]). CRAC1 had the highest odds for predicting OA progression (OR 2.014, 95% CI [0.996, 4.296], p = 0.058). Conclusions: We evaluated a parsimonious serum proteomic panel and found it to be a good discriminator of knee radiographic OA progression from non-progression. Since these biomarkers are quantifiable in serum, they could be deployed relatively easily to provide a simple, cost-effective strategy for identifying and monitoring individuals at high risk of knee OA progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.