ReviewCureus2023
Multiple Personality Disorder or Dissociative Identity Disorder: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selected Aspects of Diagnosis and Therapy in Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)-Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissociative identity disorder (DID), commonly known as multiple personality disorder (MPD), is a contentious mental health condition that typically arises as a result of traumatic events to help people avoid unpleasant memories. To completely comprehend the complexity and nuance of DID, this study investigates its symptomatology, diagnostic criteria, therapeutic modalities, and historical controversies. Patients with DID frequently have two or more distinct personality identities, each with its memories, characteristics, and attributes. Ten personality disorders are listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), but DID, formerly known as MPD, is not one of those personality disorders. Nevertheless, myths and misunderstandings cloud our knowledge of the disease, and some critics attribute the condition's emergence to therapy rather than trauma. This study emphasizes the possibilities for recovery and fulfilling life for persons affected by DID by attempting to provide a comprehensive understanding of DID, debunk myths and misconceptions, and throw light on effective therapy methods. It accomplishes this by carefully examining the body of literature and existing studies. The DID study used a systematic strategy to obtain a thorough grasp of the causes, diagnosis, symptoms, and therapies of the disorder. It employed precise keywords and Boolean operators across four databases, prioritized current peer-reviewed English-language publications, and enforced strict exclusion standards. While admitting potential biases and limits in the databases used, the research intended to maintain methodological transparency and robustness, helping to provide an accurate and up-to-date picture of DID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.