Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38116273›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

A qualitative study of primary care clinician's approach to ending cervical cancer screening in older women in the United States.

Hunter K Holt, Rey Flores, Jennifer E James, Catherine Waters, Celia P Kaplan, Caryn E Peterson, George F Sawaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hunter K HoltDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Rey FloresDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Jennifer E JamesDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, and UCSF Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Catherine WatersDepartment of Community Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Celia P KaplanDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Caryn E PetersonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
George F SawayaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alexander Keliimoeanu Smith · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that cervical cancer screening end in average-risk patients with a cervix at 65 years of age if adequate screening measures have been met, defined as having 1) at least three normal consecutive cytology (Pap) tests, or 2) two normal cytology tests and/or two negative high-risk human papillomavirus tests between ages 55-65; the last test should be performed within the prior 5 years. Up to 60 % of all women aged 65 years and older who are ending screening do not meet the criteria for adequate screening. The objective of this study was to understand the process and approach that healthcare clinicians use to determine eligibility to end cervical cancer screening. In 2021 we conducted semi-structured interviews in San Francisco, CA with twelve healthcare clinicians: two family medicine physicians, three general internal medicine physicians, two obstetrician/gynecologists and five nurse practitioners. Thematic analysis, using inductive and deductive coding, was utilized. Three major themes emerged: following guidelines, relying on self-reported data regarding prior screening, and considering sexual activity as a factor in the decision to end screening. All interviewees endorsed following the USPSTF guidelines and they utilized self-report to determine eligibility to end screening. Clinicians' approach was dependent in part on their judgement about the reliability of the patient to convey their screening history. Sexual activity of the patient was considered when making clinical recommendations. Shared decision-making was often utilized. Clinicians voiced a strong reliance on self-reported screening history to end cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCervical cancer screeningEnding screeningQualitative studyScreening guidelinesUS Preventive Services Task Force

Identifiers

PMID38116273
PMCPMC10728461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.