ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
MMGan: a multimodal MR brain tumor image segmentation method.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic structure preservation for accurate multi-modal glioma diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Adaptive Feature Medical Segmentation Network: an adaptable deep learning paradigm for high-performance 3D brain lesion segmentation in medical imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Recent deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation models using multi-modality magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective survey.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Automated brain segmentation and volumetry in dementia diagnostics: a narrative review with emphasis on FreeSurfer.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-aided diagnosis has emerged as a rapidly evolving field, garnering increased attention in recent years. At the forefront of this field is the segmentation of lesions in medical images, which is a critical preliminary stage in subsequent treatment procedures. Among the most challenging tasks in medical image analysis is the accurate and automated segmentation of brain tumors in various modalities of brain tumor MRI. In this article, we present a novel end-to-end network architecture called MMGan, which combines the advantages of residual learning and generative adversarial neural networks inspired by classical generative adversarial networks. The segmenter in the MMGan network, which has a U-Net architecture, is constructed using a deep residual network instead of the conventional convolutional neural network. The dataset used for this study is the BRATS dataset from the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge at the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Society. Our proposed method has been extensively tested, and the results indicate that this MMGan framework is more efficient and stable for segmentation tasks. On BRATS 2019, the segmentation algorithm improved accuracy and sensitivity in whole tumor, tumor core, and enhanced tumor segmentation. Particularly noteworthy is the higher dice score of 0.86 achieved by our proposed method in tumor core segmentation, surpassing those of stateof-the-art models. This study improves the accuracy and sensitivity of the tumor segmentation task, which we believe is significant for medical image analysis. And it should be further improved by replacing different loss functions such as cross-entropy loss function and other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.