ArticleSAGE open nursing
Prevalence of Cesarean Section Among Nurses: Predictors and Effect on Exclusive Breastfeeding.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of cesarean sections (CSs) in both industrialized and developing nations is a significant issue for public health officials, particularly in light of the knowledge of their socioeconomic underlying determinants. Objective: To ascertain the prevalence of CS delivery among nurses, their predictors, and the effect it has on exclusive breastfeeding practice in Tamale, Ghana. Methods: This study used a quantitative technique and an analytical cross-sectional design. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, and variable associations and predictions were identified using chi-square and logistics regression analysis. Results: There were 326 fully completed and returned questionnaires; the majority (40.0%) of respondents were registered general nurses (RGN). The majority of respondents (56.0%) were between the ages of 31 and 40. The prevalence rate of CS delivery was 21.1%. Predictor variables were; Community health nurses/RGN (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-11.0), and second degree/first degree level of educational attainment (AOR = 36.0, 95% CI = 2.4-528.9). The effects of CS delivery on exclusive breastfeeding were; low confidence to exclusively breastfeed, opting to combine both breastfeeding and artificial feeding, and less likely to practice exclusive breastfeeding. Conclusion: Even though CSs and exclusive breastfeeding practices are both problems facing nurses, CSs seem to compound the problem of exclusive breastfeeding among nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.