Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115971›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2023

Implementation of a novel thoracostomy tube trainer with real-time feedback.

Shruti Hegde, Emily Hofman, Sruthi Dubagunta, Daniel Awad, Omar Khan, Kraigen Eisaman, Ifti Hossain, James Walker, Bradley Sherman, Yash Kadakia and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shruti HegdeSurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Emily HofmanDepartment of Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Sruthi DubaguntaDepartment of Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Daniel AwadDepartment of Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Omar KhanDepartment of Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Kraigen EisamanDepartment of Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Ifti HossainDepartment of Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
James WalkerSurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Bradley ShermanSurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Yash KadakiaSurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Alex NajjarSurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Caroline ParkSurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3994-8125
The University of Texas at Dallas · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Simulation-based training leads to improved clinical performance but may be influenced by quality and frequency of training. Within simulation training, chest tube insertion remains a challenge as one of the main pitfalls of insertion is a controlled pleural entry. This study evaluates the efficacy of a novel training model with real-time pressure monitoring, the average force to pleural entry in a model and the utility of audio and visual feedback. Methods: This proprietary training model comprised a modified Kelly clamp device with three force sensors at the index finger (sensor 1) and two finger loops (sensors 2 and 3), and a manikin with a replaceable chest wall pad. Standard force values (Newtons (N)) were obtained by experts; expert data revealed that 3-5 s was an acceptable time range to complete the chest tube insertion. Participant level ranged from Post-graduate Year (PGY)-1 to PGY-6 with 13 total participants. Each individual was provided an introduction to the procedure and chest tube trainer. Force (N) and time (ms) measurements were obtained from entry through dermis to pleural space puncture. A significant pressure drop suggested puncturing through the chest wall (completion of the procedure). Results: Force data were captured during each phase of the procedure-linear, plateau, and drop. Linear phase (~3000 ms) was from start of procedure to point of maximum force (<30 N). Plateau phase was from maximum force to just before a drop in pressure. Drop phase was a drop in pressure by 5+ N in a span of 150 ms signaling completion of procedure. All participants were able to complete the task successfully. Force for pleural entry ranged from 17 N to 30 N; time to pleural entry ranged from 7500 to 15 000 ms. There was variability in use of all three sensors. All participants used the index sensor, however there was variability in the use of the loop sensors depending on the handedness of the participant. Left-handed users relied more on sensors 1 and 3 while right-handed users relied more on sensors 1 and 2. Given this variability, only force measurements from sensor 1 were used for assessment. Conclusions: This novel force-sensing chest tube trainer with continuous pressuring monitoring has a wide range of applications in simulation-based training of emergency surgical tasks. Next steps include evaluating its impact on accuracy and efficiency. Applications of real-time feedback measuring force are broad, including vascular access, trocar placement and other common procedures. Level of evidence: Level IV, prospective study.

Indexed as

education, medicalpatient simulationthoracic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID38115971
PMCPMC10729290
OpenAlexW4389562063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.