ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Comparative Clinical Implications of Calcified versus Non-Calcified Tissue Protrusion After Coronary Stent Implantation.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The prognostic implications of calcified versus non-calcified tissue protrusions (TPs) following stent implantation remain undetermined. This study aimed to evaluate the differential clinical outcomes associated with calcified and non-calcified TP morphologies. Patients and Methods: Employing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), we identified calcified TPs as calcium fragment extrusions permeating the stent struts, while non-calcified TPs were characterized as plaque and/or thrombus extensions through the stent into the arterial lumen. The primary endpoint encompassed target lesion failure (TLF), comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), or stent thrombosis, assessed in patients with a follow-up period exceeding one year. Results: Of 1033 patients subjected to pre- and post-intervention IVUS, 62 exhibited calcified TPs (6.0%), and 279 presented non-calcified TPs (27.0%), forming the basis of this analysis. Multivariable linear regression indicated calcified nodules as a significant predictor of calcified TP [Odds Ratio (OR) 2.47; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.33 to 2.62; P <0.001], with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction emerging as an inverse correlate [OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93; P = 0.004]. Two-year data revealed a higher incidence of TLF in patients with calcified TPs versus their non-calcified counterparts (11.3% vs 2.2%, P <0.001), and a marked increase in clinically driven TLR (9.7% vs 1.4%, P <0.001). Calcified TPs were independently correlated with increased TLF risk in the adjusted model [Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.47; 95% CI 1.17 to 5.16; P = 0.027]. Conclusion: After drug-eluting stent implantation, IVUS-identified calcified TPs correlate with adverse clinical outcomes compared to non-calcified TP formations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.