Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115876›Full record

ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2023

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION THROUGH ONLINE AND PHYSICAL ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRE IN ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS.

Andre Vitor Kerber Cavalcanti Lemos, Lucas Plens DE Britto Costa, Eduardo Souza Maciel, Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, Moises Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andre Vitor Kerber Cavalcanti LemosUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8974-5815
Lucas Plens DE Britto CostaUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4955-6822
Eduardo Souza MacielUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8572-7764
Nacime Salomão Barbachan MansurUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1067-727X
Moises CohenHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Grupo de Ortopedia Pediatrica, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7671-8113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The collection of clinical data is an essential step for the development of any scientific research. Online digital data collection can optimize this step. Objective: To compare the response rate and the accuracy of the clinical data collection date through the online and physical digital questionnaire in orthopedic patients. Methods: Comparative study, level III of evidence, with forty patients who had ankle sprains were evaluated, followed up for a period of 12 weeks with the application of physical and digital Visual Analogue Scale, Foot Function Index and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool questionnaires, and data were collected about the moment of collection of each questionnaire. Results: We obtained a response rate of 83.3% in the digital collection group and 60% in the physical collection group (p < 0.05), and the response rate in the digital collection group was higher at all times of collection (3, 6 and 12 weeks). Analysis of the time of collection shows greater variability in the larger physical collection group at all times of the study (2.8 vs 1.5; 4.0 vs 2.4; 8.6 vs 1.5). Conclusion: Digital data collection is effective for obtaining clinical data in patients with ankle sprains.

Indexed as

AnkleData CollectionInternetSprains and Strains

Identifiers

PMID38115876
PMCPMC10726704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.