Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115853›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2023

Effects of probiotics on neurocognitive outcomes in infants and young children: a meta-analysis.

Feng-Li Lin, Chia-Min Chen, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Yu-Shian Cheng, Ruu-Fen Tzang, Hsien-Jane Chiu, Ming-Yu Wang, Ying-Chih Cheng, Kuo-Chuan Hung

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-controlled Trials on the Effects of Probiotics for Autism Spectrum Disorders.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng-Li Lin *Taoyuan Psychiatric Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chia-Min Chen *Department of Natural Biotechnology, Nanhua University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Cheuk-Kwan Sun *Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Dachang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu-Shian ChengDepartment of Psychiatry, Tsyr-Huey Mental Hospital, Kaohsiung Jen-Ai's Home, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ruu-Fen TzangDepartment of Psychiatry, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsien-Jane ChiuTaoyuan Psychiatric Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ming-Yu WangDepartment of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, China Medical University, Hsinchu, China.
Ying-Chih ChengDepartment of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, China Medical University, Hsinchu, China.
Kuo-Chuan HungDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Capital Medical University · CNChi Mei Medical Center · TWChina Medical University · CNI-Shou University · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TWNanhua University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic efficacies of probiotics in improving neurocognitive functions in infants and young children remained unclear. This meta-analysis focused on different cognitive outcomes in this population. Methods: Major databases were searched electronically from inception to October 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics in enhancing cognitive functions assessed by standardized tasks. The overall effect size was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) based on a random effects model. Results: Nine RCTs with 3,026 participants were identified. Both our primary and secondary results demonstrated no significant difference in neurocognitive outcomes between infants/children treated with probiotics and those receiving placebos. However, our subgroup analysis of studies that offered a probiotics treatment course of over six months demonstrated a significantly better neurocognitive outcome than placebos (SMD = 0.21, Conclusion: Despite lack of significant therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive outcomes, our finding of a positive impact of probiotics on neurocognitive development in those undergoing treatment for over six months may provide an important direction for further investigations into the enhancement of therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive development in infants and young children. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023463412.

Indexed as

CognitionProbioticsChild, PreschoolHumansInfantRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicchildcognitive functionsmeta-analysisneuroinflammationprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID38115853
PMCPMC10728653
OpenAlexW4389344586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.