Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115812›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Gait variability-based classification of the stages of the cognitive decline using partial least squares-discriminant analysis.

Kiyoung Kwak, Emilija Kostic, Dongwook Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiyoung KwakDivision of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8187-8250
Emilija KosticDepartment of Healthcare Engineering, The Graduate School, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-6996
Dongwook KimDivision of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3293-9541
Jeonbuk National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in gait variability in terms of spatiotemporal, sub-gait cycle, ground reaction force, and the joint profiles of kinematics and kinetics between older individuals with and without risk of potential cognitive impairment, and to derive the crucial features to discriminating the older adults with future risk cognitive decline by using partial least squares-discriminant analysis. A total of 90 community-dwelling older adults aged over 65 years underwent cognitive function assessment and were divided into three groups depending on cognitive assessment score. The participants' level-walking was analyzed by using three-dimensional instrumented gait analysis. The coefficient of variation was extracted and then comparatively analyzed depending on the stages of the cognitive decline. To identify the most important contributor when differentiating the older adults with a risk of future cognitive decline, partial least squares-discriminant analysis was applied, and the discriminative power of the coefficients confirmed as features of great importance were investigated via the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve. The differences in gait variability were found mainly between the suspected dementia groups and other groups, especially in joint dynamics variables. Through the partial least squares-discriminant analysis, the discriminative features were found as follows: the mid-stance, the moments, and the power in the hip, knee, and ankle joints. In addition, the discrimination model was found to differentiate well between the three groups. The classification accuracy of intact cognition, diminished cognition, and suspected dementia was 0.857, 0.710, and 0.857, respectively. These findings mean that gait variability changes according to continuous cognitive decline, especially in sub-gait cycles and joint biomechanics, and suggest that measures of variation can be used as predictors to identify older individuals with a risk of potential cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedDiscriminant AnalysisGaitHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisclassificationCognitive impairmentdementiagait variabilityPLS-DA

Identifiers

PMID38115812
PMCPMC10734339
OpenAlexW4390015056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.