ArticleScience progress
Gait variability-based classification of the stages of the cognitive decline using partial least squares-discriminant analysis.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Timed Up and Go dual-task test's cognitive and motor outcomes show promising test-retest reliability in older adults with perceived memory impairment.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- From Sequence to Solution: Intelligent Learning Engine Optimization in Drug Discovery and Protein Analysis.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in gait variability in terms of spatiotemporal, sub-gait cycle, ground reaction force, and the joint profiles of kinematics and kinetics between older individuals with and without risk of potential cognitive impairment, and to derive the crucial features to discriminating the older adults with future risk cognitive decline by using partial least squares-discriminant analysis. A total of 90 community-dwelling older adults aged over 65 years underwent cognitive function assessment and were divided into three groups depending on cognitive assessment score. The participants' level-walking was analyzed by using three-dimensional instrumented gait analysis. The coefficient of variation was extracted and then comparatively analyzed depending on the stages of the cognitive decline. To identify the most important contributor when differentiating the older adults with a risk of future cognitive decline, partial least squares-discriminant analysis was applied, and the discriminative power of the coefficients confirmed as features of great importance were investigated via the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve. The differences in gait variability were found mainly between the suspected dementia groups and other groups, especially in joint dynamics variables. Through the partial least squares-discriminant analysis, the discriminative features were found as follows: the mid-stance, the moments, and the power in the hip, knee, and ankle joints. In addition, the discrimination model was found to differentiate well between the three groups. The classification accuracy of intact cognition, diminished cognition, and suspected dementia was 0.857, 0.710, and 0.857, respectively. These findings mean that gait variability changes according to continuous cognitive decline, especially in sub-gait cycles and joint biomechanics, and suggest that measures of variation can be used as predictors to identify older individuals with a risk of potential cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.