Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115730›Full record

SynthesisCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

Clinical neuromodulatory effects of deep brain stimulation in disorder of consciousness: A literature review.

Tianqing Cao, Shenghong He, Luchen Wang, Xiaoke Chai, Qiheng He, Dongsheng Liu, Dong Wang, Nan Wang, Jianghong He, Shouyang Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tianqing CaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-9464
Shenghong HeMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Luchen WangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoke ChaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qiheng HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6715-298X
Dongsheng LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dong WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, China.
Nan WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jianghong HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-1954-546X
Shouyang WangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jizong ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-0255
Huiling TanMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Capital Medical University · CNFudan University · CNUniversity of Oxford · GBAviation General Hospital · CNGanzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

2022 Open Project of Key Laboratory and Engineering Technology Research Center in the Rehabilitation Field of the Ministry of Civil Affairs 2022GKZS0003Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7232049Chinese Institute for Brain Research Youth Scholar Program 2022-NKX-XM-02Guarantors of Brain HMR04170International (Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) Science and Technology Cooperation Project Z221100002722014Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/2Royal Society IES\R3\213123Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Young Scientists Project of Brain Science and Brain-Like Research 2022ZD0205300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) presents substantial challenges in clinical practice. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a potential therapeutic approach, but the lack of standardized regulatory parameters for DBS in DOC hinders definitive conclusions.

objectiveThis comprehensive review aims to provide a detailed summary of the current issues concerning patient selection, target setting, and modulation parameters in clinical studies investigating the application of DBS for DOC patients.

methodsA meticulous systematic analysis of the literatures was conducted, encompassing articles published from 1968 to April 2023, retrieved from reputable databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science).

resultsThe systematic analysis of 21 eligible articles, involving 146 patients with DOC resulting from acquired brain injury or other disorders, revealed significant insights. The most frequently targeted regions were the Centromedian-parafascicular complex (CM-pf) nuclei and central thalamus (CT), both recognized for their role in regulating consciousness. However, other targets have also been explored in different studies. The stimulation frequency was predominantly set at 25 or 100 Hz, with pulse width of 120 μs, and voltages ranged from 0 to 4 V. These parameters were customized based on individual patient responses and evaluations. The overall clinical efficacy rate in all included studies was 39.7%, indicating a positive effect of DBS in a subset of DOC patients. Nonetheless, the assessment methods, follow-up durations, and outcome measures varied across studies, potentially contributing to the variability in reported efficacy rates.

conclusionDespite the challenges arising from the lack of standardized parameters, DBS shows promising potential as a therapeutic option for patients with DOC. However, there still remains the need for standardized protocols and assessment methods, which are crucial to deepen the understanding and optimizing the therapeutic potential of DBS in this specific patient population.

Indexed as

Consciousness DisordersDeep Brain StimulationHumansdeep brain stimulationdisorder of consciousnesseffectivenessneuromodulation therapy

Identifiers

PMID38115730
PMCPMC11163193
OpenAlexW4390016540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.