Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115726›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2023

How enlightened self-interest guided global vaccine sharing benefits all: A modeling study.

Zhenyu Han, Lin Chen, Qianyue Hao, Qiwei He, Katherine Budeski, Depeng Jin, Fengli Xu, Kun Tang, Yong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhenyu HanBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (BNRist), Beijing, P. R. China.
Lin ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Qianyue HaoBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (BNRist), Beijing, P. R. China.
Qiwei HeVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Katherine BudeskiNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.
Depeng JinBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (BNRist), Beijing, P. R. China.
Fengli XuDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Kun TangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yong LiBeijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (BNRist), Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite consensus that vaccines play an important role in combatting the global spread of infectious diseases, vaccine inequity is still a prevalent issue due to a deep-seated mentality of self-priority. We aimed to evaluate the existence and possible outcomes of a more equitable global vaccine distribution and explore a concrete incentive mechanism that promotes vaccine equity. Methods: We designed a metapopulation epidemiological model that simultaneously considers global vaccine distribution and human mobility, which we then calibrated by the number of infections and real-world vaccination records during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic from March 2020 to July 2021. We explored the possibility of the enlightened self-interest incentive mechanism, which comprises improving one's own epidemic outcomes by sharing vaccines with other countries, by evaluating the number of infections and deaths under various vaccine sharing strategies using the proposed model. To understand how these strategies affect the national interests, we distinguished imported from local cases for further cost-benefit analyses that rationalise the enlightened self-interest incentive mechanism behind vaccine sharing. Results: The proposed model accurately reproduces the real-world cumulative infections for both global and regional epidemics (R Conclusions: The incentive mechanism of enlightened self-interest we explored here could motivate vaccine equity by realigning the national interest to more equitable vaccine distributions. The positive results could promote multilateral collaborations in global vaccine redistribution and reconcile conflicted national interests, which could in turn benefit the global population.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPandemicsVaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38115726
PMCPMC10731134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.