Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115694›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration and Risk Classification of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Huan Yang, Zhe Lv, Wenxi Wang, Yaohui Wang, Jie Chen, Zhanqiu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. [A prediction model for early neurological improvement after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huan YangDepartment of Emergency, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5593-1213
Zhe LvDepartment of Emergency, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Wenxi WangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Yaohui WangDepartment of Emergency, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Emergency, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Zhanqiu WangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9336-170X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to create machine learning models for predicting early neurological deterioration and risk classification in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) before intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). The study included 704 AIS patients categorized into END and non-END groups. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to select the best predictors from clinical indicators, leading to the creation of Model 1. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent predictive factors for END from inflammatory cell ratios. These factors were combined with clinical indicators, forming Model 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the models' predictive performance. Key variables for Model 1 included the NIHSS score, systolic blood pressure, and lymphocyte percentage. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio, Platelet-to-Neutrophil ratio, and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio independently predicted END. Model 1 exhibited moderate predictive ability (AUC 0.721 in training, AUC 0.635 in test). Model 2, which integrated clinical indicators and inflammatory cell ratios, demonstrated strong performance in both training (AUC 0.862) and test (AUC 0.816). Machine learning models, combining clinical indicators and inflammatory cell ratios before IVT, accurately predict END and associated risk in AIS.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeAdministration, IntravenousBlood PlateletsHumansMachine LearningNeutrophilsacute ischemic strokeinflammationintravenous thrombolysismachine learningnomogram

Identifiers

PMID38115694
PMCPMC10734329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.