Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115090›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2023

Characterization of an iPSC-based barrier model for blood-brain barrier investigations using the SBAD0201 stem cell line.

Burak Ozgür, Elena Puris, Andreas Brachner, Antje Appelt-Menzel, Sabrina Oerter, Viktor Balzer, Mikkel Roland Holst, Rasmus Folmann Christiansen, Kathrine Hyldig, Stephen T Buckley and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Burak OzgürDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.
Elena PurisInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas BrachnerAIT - Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, 1210, Austria.
Antje Appelt-MenzelChair Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Würzburg, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Sabrina OerterChair Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Würzburg, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Viktor BalzerInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mikkel Roland HolstDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark.
Rasmus Folmann ChristiansenBiotherapeutic Discovery, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, DK-2500, Denmark.
Kathrine HyldigBiotherapeutic Discovery, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, DK-2500, Denmark.
Stephen T BuckleyGlobal Research Technologies, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, DK-2760, Denmark.
Mie KristensenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.
Seppo AuriolaSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Allan JensenBiotherapeutic Discovery, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, DK-2500, Denmark.
Gert FrickerInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Morten Schallburg NielsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark.
Winfried NeuhausAIT - Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, 1210, Austria.
Birger BrodinDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark. birger.brodin@sund.ku.dk.
Heidelberg University · DELundbeck (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKAustrian Institute of Technology · ATFraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research · DENovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood-brain barrier (BBB) models based on primary murine, bovine, and porcine brain capillary endothelial cell cultures have long been regarded as robust models with appropriate properties to examine the functional transport of small molecules. However, species differences sometimes complicate translating results from these models to human settings. During the last decade, brain capillary endothelial-like cells (BCECs) have been generated from stem cell sources to model the human BBB in vitro. The aim of the present study was to establish and characterize a human BBB model using human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived BCECs from the hIPSC line SBAD0201.

methodsThe model was evaluated using transcriptomics, proteomics, immunocytochemistry, transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements, and, finally, transport assays to assess the functionality of selected transporters and receptor (GLUT-1, LAT-1, P-gp and LRP-1).

resultsThe resulting BBB model displayed an average TEER of 5474 ± 167 Ω·cm

conclusionsIn conclusion, the novel SBAD0201-derived BBB model formed tight monolayers and was proven useful for studies investigating GLUT-1, LAT-1, and LRP-1 mediated transport across the BBB. However, the model did not express functional P-gp and thus is not suitable for the performance of drug efflux P-gp reletated studies.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsBiological TransportBrainCattleCell LineCells, CulturedHumansMembrane Transport ProteinsMiceSwineMembrane Transport ProteinsBlood-brain barrier (BBB)Brain capillary endothelial-like cells (BCECs)Efflux transportersHuman induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)Solute carriers (SLC) transportersTight junctions

Identifiers

PMID38115090
PMCPMC10731806
OpenAlexW4389936088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.