ArticleBMC nursing2023
Physicians' attitudes towards the development of the nurse prescribing role in critical care and emergency departments.
Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nurse Prescribing Self-Efficacy Scale.BMJ open · 2026Article
- The attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Measuring Stereotypes in Interprofessional Education: A Pilot High-Fidelity Simulation Study Among Postgraduate Nursing and Physician Students in a Spanish University.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe progression of the nurse prescribing role encounters numerous challenges, with physician resistance being a significant obstacle. This study aims to assess physicians' perspectives regarding the expansion of the nurse prescribing role within critical care and emergency departments.
methodsThis cross-sectional study employed convenience sampling to enroll 193 physicians. Data collection instruments included a demographic information form and a researcher-developed questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data using SPSS-22 software.
resultsA total of 193 physicians participated in the survey, with a mean age of 41.9 ± 10.7 years. Among physicians from various age groups, genders, educational backgrounds, and clinical experiences, more than 60% acknowledged prescribing medicine as an essential component of their professional responsibilities. However, a significant majority of physicians in these categories agreed that in emergency situations, nurses should be allowed to prescribe medication to save patients' lives. It is worth noting that, unlike specialist and fellowship physicians, a majority of general practitioners (83.3%) held the view that nurse-prescribed medications do not contribute to the professional development of nursing. The nurse prescribing role encountered several predominant obstacles, namely legal consequences (78.8%), interference of duties between physicians and nurses (74.1%), and a legal vacuum (77.2%).
conclusionThe majority of physicians expressed a favorable attitude towards nurse prescribing in emergency and critical care departments. To facilitate the development of the nurse prescribing role, it is essential to ensure the acquisition of scientific qualifications and implement necessary changes in nursing curricula across bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.