Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38115047›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Online learning resources and social media platforms used by medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Samy A Azer, Deema Alhudaithi, Fay AlBuqami, Haifa AlWaily, Razan AlRabah, Raghad AlKhashan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samy A AzerDepartment of Medical Education, Curriculum Development and Research Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia. azer2000@optusnet.com.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-3256
Deema AlhudaithiDepartment of Medical Education, Curriculum Development and Research Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5326-9600
Fay AlBuqamiDepartment of Medical Education, Curriculum Development and Research Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7119-0271
Haifa AlWailyDepartment of Medical Education, Curriculum Development and Research Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-2649
Razan AlRabahDepartment of Medical Education, Curriculum Development and Research Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-5595
Raghad AlKhashanDepartment of Medical Education, Curriculum Development and Research Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1290-9348
King Saud Medical City · SA

Funding

College of Medicine, King Saud University College of Medicine Research Center, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to medical students' education. It imposed challenges that required rapid adaptation to enforced lockdowns and remote learning and changed curriculum delivery from in-person to online learning and virtual technology.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the trends and ratings of using Internet resources and social media platforms by medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA validated questionnaire was used to explore preferences for Internet resources and social media platforms among undergraduate medical students (years 1, 3, and 5) at King Saud University. The questionnaire comprised three sections- (i) demographic information, (ii) access and use of Internet resources/social media platforms, and (iii) students' ratings and reasons for using technology-enabled learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsA total of 320 undergraduate medical students responded to the online questionnaire. The difference in the number of students using the Internet daily across academic years increased significantly as they progressed in the medical course (p = 0.025). For learning, YouTube and Videoconferencing (e.g. Zoom) were used by 83.1% and 73.4% of students, respectively, followed by WhatsApp 198 (61.9%). For social interaction, WhatsApp, 310 (96.6%); YouTube, 296 (92.8%); Twitter, 288 (90%); and Zoom, 269 (84.1%) were the platforms used by most students. Regarding concerns about the impact of COVID-19 and social isolation, 250 (78.1%) agreed that technology helped them gain a sense of connectedness to their peers. Over half of students, 187 (58.4%) wished that technologies be integrated more often in their courses, as 245 (76.7%) agreed that it helped engage them with classes.

conclusionThe study shows that the use of the Internet and social media resources is increasing at all levels to fill the gap in learning and social interaction because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical institutions should embrace the effective use of Internet resources and use the experience gained and lessons learned in guiding educators on what type of online resources should be created to add value to students learning even post-pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceSocial MediaStudents, MedicalCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsInternet resourcesOnline learningSocial mediaStudents’ useTechnology

Identifiers

PMID38115047
PMCPMC10731888
OpenAlexW4389936735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.