Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114869›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2023

Notes on the Use of Kirchhoff's Laws in Pharmacokinetics.

Ronald A Siegel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recalling the Definition of Basic Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Avoid Potential Pitfalls.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Commentary: Pharmacokinetic Theory Must Consider Published Experimental Data.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronald A SiegelDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, USA. siege017@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9591-1282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent publications by Benet and coworkers, Korzekwa and Nagar, and Rowland et al. signal disagreement regarding the use of Kirchhoff's laws in combining pharmacokinetic parameters, especially clearances and rate constants. Here, it is pointed out that Kirchhoff's laws as applied to pharmacokinetics simply assert that concentrations are well defined and that molar or mass balances hold. The real issue is how to combine parameters for clearance processes in sequence, which may be reversible, irreversible, or even active in either or both directions. It is also demonstrated that Kirchhoff's laws cannot be used to resolve contradictory results observed in liver transport and clearance. Finally, a simple argument is provided relating nonlinear clearance to apparently anomalous bioavailability observations.

Indexed as

Biological AvailabilityKineticsBioavailabilityClearanceGeneralized clearanceKirchhoff’s lawsRate constant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.