Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114849›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Deep learning for malignancy risk estimation of incidental sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules on CT images.

Rui Zhang, Ying Wei, Denian Wang, Bojiang Chen, Huaiqiang Sun, Yi Lei, Qing Zhou, Zhuang Luo, Li Jiang, Rong Qiu and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic approach for incidental pulmonary nodules.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rui ZhangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ying WeiDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Denian WangPrecision Medicine Center, Precision Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bojiang ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Huaiqiang SunHuaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yi LeiGeneral Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qing ZhouDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Zhuang LuoDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Li JiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Rong QiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Feng ShiDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China. feng.shi@uii-ai.com.
Weimin LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. weimin003@163.com.
United Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CNAffiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CNKunming Medical University · CNSuizhou Central Hospital · CNWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish deep learning models for malignancy risk estimation of sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules incidentally detected by chest CT and managed in clinical settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour deep learning models were trained using CT images of sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules from West China Hospital, internally tested, and externally validated on three cohorts. The four models respectively learned 3D deep features from the baseline whole lung region, baseline image patch where the nodule located, baseline nodule box, and baseline plus follow-up nodule boxes. All regions of interest were automatically segmented except that the nodule boxes were additionally manually checked. The performance of models was compared with each other and that of three respiratory clinicians.

resultsThere were 1822 nodules (981 malignant) in the training set, 806 (416 malignant) in the testing set, and 357 (253 malignant) totally in the external sets. The area under the curve (AUC) in the testing set was 0.754, 0.855, 0.928, and 0.942, respectively, for models derived from baseline whole lung, image patch, nodule box, and the baseline plus follow-up nodule boxes. When baseline models externally validated (follow-up images not available), the nodule-box model outperformed the other two with AUC being 0.808, 0.848, and 0.939 respectively in the three external datasets. The resident, junior, and senior clinicians achieved an accuracy of 67.0%, 82.5%, and 90.0%, respectively, in the testing set. The follow-up model performed comparably to the senior clinician.

conclusionThe deep learning algorithms solely mining nodule information can efficiently predict malignancy of incidental sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The established models may be valuable for supporting clinicians in routine clinical practice, potentially reducing the number of unnecessary examinations and also delays in diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • According to different regions of interest, four deep learning models were developed and compared to evaluate the malignancy of sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules by CT images. • The models derived from baseline nodule box or baseline plus follow-up nodule boxes demonstrated sufficient diagnostic accuracy (86.4% and 90.4% in the testing set), outperforming the respiratory resident (67.0%) and junior clinician (82.5%). • The proposed deep learning methods may aid clinicians in optimizing follow-up recommendations for sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules and may lead to fewer unnecessary diagnostic interventions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIncidental FindingsLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRisk AssessmentSolitary Pulmonary NoduleComputed tomographyDeep learningLung cancerSub-centimeter pulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID38114849
OpenAlexW4390012355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.