ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Deep learning for malignancy risk estimation of incidental sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules on CT images.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of a multimodal MRI model integrating radiomics and habitat features for predicting glioma pathology and prognosis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- DeepFAN, a transformer-based model for human-artificial intelligence collaborative assessment of incidental pulmonary nodules in CT scans: a multireader, multicase trial.Nature cancer · 2026Article
- Associations among MRI-derived glymphatic system impairment, gray matter reserve and white matter integrity in cerebral small-vessel disease patients.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Predictive Factors and Nomogram for Malignant Pulmonary Nodules (≤ 1 cm).Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- MLND-IU: A multi-stage detection model of subcentimeter lung nodule with improved U-Net+.PloS one · 2026Article
- Emerging technologies in thoracic surgery: artificial intelligence, robotic-assisted surgery, and telesurgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Diagnostic approach for incidental pulmonary nodules.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- A multi-view CNN model to predict resolving of new lung nodules on follow-up low-dose chest CT.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Enhanced Malignancy Prediction of Small Lung Nodules in Different Populations Using Transfer Learning on Low-Dose Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- China Protocol for early screening, precise diagnosis, and individualized treatment of lung cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Radiology: A Narrative Review.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2025Article
- Review
- The value of multiparametric MRI-based habitat imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from atypical leiomyomas: a multicentre study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Establishment and verification of a prediction model based on clinical characteristics and computed tomography radiomics parameters for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Glymphatic imaging: a critical look at the DTI-ALPS index.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish deep learning models for malignancy risk estimation of sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules incidentally detected by chest CT and managed in clinical settings. MATERIALS AND
methodsFour deep learning models were trained using CT images of sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules from West China Hospital, internally tested, and externally validated on three cohorts. The four models respectively learned 3D deep features from the baseline whole lung region, baseline image patch where the nodule located, baseline nodule box, and baseline plus follow-up nodule boxes. All regions of interest were automatically segmented except that the nodule boxes were additionally manually checked. The performance of models was compared with each other and that of three respiratory clinicians.
resultsThere were 1822 nodules (981 malignant) in the training set, 806 (416 malignant) in the testing set, and 357 (253 malignant) totally in the external sets. The area under the curve (AUC) in the testing set was 0.754, 0.855, 0.928, and 0.942, respectively, for models derived from baseline whole lung, image patch, nodule box, and the baseline plus follow-up nodule boxes. When baseline models externally validated (follow-up images not available), the nodule-box model outperformed the other two with AUC being 0.808, 0.848, and 0.939 respectively in the three external datasets. The resident, junior, and senior clinicians achieved an accuracy of 67.0%, 82.5%, and 90.0%, respectively, in the testing set. The follow-up model performed comparably to the senior clinician.
conclusionThe deep learning algorithms solely mining nodule information can efficiently predict malignancy of incidental sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The established models may be valuable for supporting clinicians in routine clinical practice, potentially reducing the number of unnecessary examinations and also delays in diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • According to different regions of interest, four deep learning models were developed and compared to evaluate the malignancy of sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules by CT images. • The models derived from baseline nodule box or baseline plus follow-up nodule boxes demonstrated sufficient diagnostic accuracy (86.4% and 90.4% in the testing set), outperforming the respiratory resident (67.0%) and junior clinician (82.5%). • The proposed deep learning methods may aid clinicians in optimizing follow-up recommendations for sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules and may lead to fewer unnecessary diagnostic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.