Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: diagnostic value of MRI features in differentiating pathologic subclassifications-type 1 versus type 2.

objectivesTo identify MRI features for differentiating type 2 from type 1 intraductal papillary neoplasms of bile duct (IPNB) and assessing malignant potential of IPNB.

methodsThis retrospective study included 60 patients with surgically proven IPNB who had undergone preoperative MRI between January 2007 and December 2020. All surgical specimens were reviewed retrospectively to classify types 1 and 2 IPNBs and assess tumor grade. Significant MRI features for differentiating type 2 (n = 40) from type 1 IPNB (n = 20); and for IPNB with an associated invasive carcinoma (n = 43) from intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 17) were determined using logistic regression analysis.

resultsAn associated invasive carcinoma was more frequently found in type 2 than in type 1 IPNB (85.0% [34/40] vs. 45.0% [9/20], p = 0.003). At univariable analysis, MRI features including extrahepatic location, no dilatation of tumor-bearing segment of bile duct, isolated upstream bile duct dilatation, and single lesion were associated with type 2 IPNB (all p ≤ 0.012). At multivariable analysis, significant MRI findings for differentiating type 2 from type 1 IPNB were extrahepatic location and no dilatation of tumor-bearing segment of bile duct (odds ratio [OR], 7.24 and 46.40, respectively). At univariable and multivariable analysis, tumor size ≥ 2.5 cm (OR, 8.45), bile duct wall thickening (OR, 4.82), and irregular polypoid or nodular tumor shape (OR, 6.44) were significant MRI features for differentiating IPNB with an associated invasive carcinoma from IPNB with intraepithelial neoplasia.

conclusionMRI with MR cholangiopancreatography may be helpful in differentiating type 2 IPNB from type 1 IPNB and assessing malignant potential of IPNB. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Preoperative MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography may be helpful in differentiating type 2 intraductal papillary neoplasms of bile duct (IPNB) from type 1 IPNB and assessing malignant potential of IPNB. KEY POINTS: • In terms of tumor grade, the incidence of invasive carcinoma was significantly higher in type 2 intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) than in type 1 IPNB. • At MRI, extrahepatic location and no dilatation of tumor-bearing segment are significant features for differentiating type 2 IPNBs from type 1 IPNBs. • At MRI, large tumor size, bile duct wall thickening, and irregular polypoid or nodular tumor shape are significant features for differentiating IPNB with an associated invasive carcinoma from IPNB with intraepithelial neoplasia.