Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114797›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2024

Using Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Karol Martínez-Palacios, Sebastián Vásquez-García, Olubunmi A Fariyike, Chiara Robba, Andrés M Rubiano, noninvasive ICP monitoring international consensus group

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06772155 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Effectiveness Study on Catheter Locking Device Versus Standard Ventriculostomy for Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients With Intracranial Compartment Syndrome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMeditech FoundationRan2025 to 2027Enrolled292ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injuries, Intracranial HypertensionArmsVentriculostomy, Ventriculostomy + Locking Device
NCT06776614 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative-effectiveness Study on Expansion Craniotomy Versus Decompressive Craniectomy for Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Intracranial Compartment Syndrome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMeditech FoundationRan2025 to 2027Enrolled292ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injuries, Intracranial HypertensionArmsDecompressive Craniectomy, Expansion Craniotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Karol Martínez-PalaciosNeuroscience Institute, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-4761
Sebastián Vásquez-GarcíaMEDITECH Foundation, Calle 7a #44-95, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-1763
Olubunmi A FariyikeMEDITECH Foundation, Calle 7a #44-95, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9626-3144
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1628-3845
Andrés M RubianoNeuroscience Institute, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia. andresrubiano@aol.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-3254
noninvasive ICP monitoring international consensus group
ProPacífico · COUniversidad El Bosque · COOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRInserm · FRPalo Alto University · USUniversidad del Rosario · COUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeuromonitoring represents a cornerstone in the comprehensive management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), allowing for early detection of complications such as increased intracranial pressure (ICP) [1]. This has led to a search for noninvasive modalities that are reliable and deployable at bedside. Among these, ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement is a strong contender, estimating ICP by quantifying the distension of the optic nerve at higher ICP values. Thus, this scoping review seeks to describe the existing evidence for the use of ONSD in estimating ICP in adult TBI patients as compared to gold-standard invasive methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, with a main search of PubMed and EMBASE. The search was limited to studies of adult patients with TBI published in any language between 2012 and 2022. Sixteen studies were included for analysis, with all studies conducted in high-income countries.

resultsAll of the studies reviewed measured ONSD using the same probe frequency. In most studies, the marker position for ONSD measurement was initially 3 mm behind the globe, retina, or papilla. A few studies utilized additional parameters such as the ONSD/ETD (eyeball transverse diameter) ratio or ODE (optic disc elevation), which also exhibit high sensitivity and reliability.

conclusionOverall, ONSD exhibits great test accuracy and has a strong, almost linear correlation with invasive methods. Thus, ONSD should be considered one of the most effective noninvasive techniques for ICP estimation in TBI patients.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureOptic NerveUltrasonographyHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicNeurophysiological MonitoringIntracranial hypertensionIntracranial pressure (ICP)Invasive monitoringMonitoringNoninvasive monitoringOptic nerve sheath diameterOptic nerve ultrasoundTraumatic brain injury (TBI)

Identifiers

PMID38114797
PMCPMC11147909
OpenAlexW4389941942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.