Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114757›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2024

Improving Data Collection in Pregnancy Safety Studies: Towards Standardisation of Data Elements in Pregnancy Reports from Public and Private Partners, A Contribution from the ConcePTION Project.

Guillaume Favre, Jonathan L Richardson, Alan Moore, Yvonne Geissbühler, Valentine Jehl, Alison Oliver, Svetlana Shechtman, Orna Diav-Citrin, Maya Berlin, Tal De Haan and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Guillaume FavreSwiss Teratology Information Service and Clinical Pharmacology Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jonathan L RichardsonUK Teratology Information Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Alan MooreNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Yvonne GeissbühlerNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Valentine JehlNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Alison OliverUK Teratology Information Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Svetlana ShechtmanThe Israeli Teratology Information Service, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Orna Diav-CitrinThe Israeli Teratology Information Service, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Maya BerlinClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Drug Consultation Center, Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Zerifin TIS, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tal De HaanClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Drug Consultation Center, Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Zerifin TIS, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
David BaudMaterno-fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department "Femme-Mère-Enfant", Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alice PanchaudInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anil MorEpidemiology and Benefit Risk, Sanofi, North York, ON, Canada.
Meritxell SabidóMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Sabrina de SouzaMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Christina ChambersOrganization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Yrea R J van Rijt-WeetinkPharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Eugène P van PuijenbroekPharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Laura M YatesNorthern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
François GirardinSwiss Teratology Information Service and Clinical Pharmacology Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michael Stellfeld *Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Ursula Winterfeld *Swiss Teratology Information Service and Clinical Pharmacology Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. ursula.winterfeld@chuv.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-9926-7164

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 821520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectiveThe ConcePTION project aims to improve the way medication use during pregnancy is studied. This includes exploring the possibility of developing a distributed data processing and analysis infrastructure using a common data model that could form a foundational platform for future surveillance and research. A prerequisite would be that data from various data access providers (DAPs) can be harmonised according to an agreed set of standard rules concerning the structure and content of the data. To do so, a reference framework of core data elements (CDEs) recommended for primary data studies on drug safety during pregnancy was previously developed. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of several public and private DAPs using different primary data sources focusing on multiple sclerosis, as a pilot, to map their respective data variables and definitions with the CDE recommendations framework.

methodsFour pregnancy registries (Gilenya, Novartis; Aubagio, Sanofi; the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists [OTIS]; Aubagio, Sanofi; the Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register, Lareb), two enhanced pharmacovigilance programmes (Gilenya PRIM, Novartis; MAPLE-MS, Merck Healthcare KGaA) and four Teratology Information Services (UK TIS, Jerusalem TIS, Zerifin TIS, Swiss TIS) participated in the study. The ConcePTION primary data source CDE includes 51 items covering administrative functions, the description of pregnancy, maternal medical history, maternal illnesses arising in pregnancy, delivery details, and pregnancy and infant outcomes. For each variable in the CDE, the DAPs identified whether their variables were: identical to the one mentioned in the CDE; derived; similar but with a divergent definition; or not available.

resultsThe majority of the DAP data variables were either directly taken (85%, n = 305/357, range 73-94% between DAPs) or derived by combining different variables (12%, n = 42/357, range 0-24% between DAPs) to conform to the CDE variables and definitions. For very few of the DAP variables, alignment with the CDE items was not possible, either because of divergent definitions (1%, n = 3/357, range 0-2% between DAPs) or because the variables were not available (2%, n = 7/357, range 0-4% between DAPs).

conclusionsData access providers participating in this study presented a very high proportion of variables matching the CDE items, indicating that alignment of definitions and harmonisation of data analysis by different stakeholders to accelerate and strengthen pregnancy pharmacovigilance safety data analyses could be feasible.

Indexed as

CrotonatesFingolimod HydrochlorideHydroxybutyratesNitrilesToluidinesData CollectionFemaleHumansPregnancyRegistriesCrotonatesFingolimod HydrochlorideHydroxybutyratesNitrilesteriflunomideToluidines

Identifiers

PMID38114757
PMCPMC10874316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.