Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114740›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

Conservative treatment outcome for Achilles tendon re-rupture occurring in the subacute phase after primary repair.

Jun Young Choi, Suk Kyu Choo, Byung Ho Kim, Jin Soo Suh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun Young ChoiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Suk Kyu ChooDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Byung Ho KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Jin Soo SuhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea. sjs0506@paik.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-9149
Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUntil now, a treatment protocol for Achilles tendon re-rupture (ATRR) occurring in the postoperative period 5-12 weeks following primary Achilles tendon repair has not been established. We refer to this time frame as the subacute postoperative phase, and the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of conservative treatment for subacute ATRR in this phase. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 390 cases (385 patients) who had undergone primary Achilles tendon repair using the 4-strand Krachow method between January 2010 and August 2021. All patients were subjected to more than 12 months of follow-up and were categorized into two groups based on the presence of subacute ATRR: Group 1 comprised 370 cases without ATRR, while Group 2 comprised 20 cases with ATRR. Following confirmation of ATRR, we immediately applied a below-knee cast in an ankle plantar flexed position (25°-30°), followed by bracing according to the same rehabilitation plan used for the primary repair. After administering conservative treatment to the patients with ATRR, we compared several outcome parameters between the two groups, including isokinetic plantar flexion power measured using a dynamometer, time required for a single heel raise (t-SHR), time needed for ten repetitive SHRs (t-SHR10), Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores. The baseline timepoints for Groups 1 and 2 were the dates of the primary repair and the re-injury event.

resultsAfter primary Achilles tendon repair, subacute ATRR occurred in 5.1% of patients. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of t-SHR and t-SHR10 (P = 0.281, 0.486). Similarly, the isokinetic dynamometer measurements revealed no significant differences in peak torque for plantar flexion at angular velocities of 30°/s and 120°/s, both in absolute values and as a percentage of the contralateral side, between the groups (P > 0.05 for each). However, ATRSs were significantly lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 before 6 months (P < 0.05), as were FAAM-Activities of Daily Living scores at 6 months (P < 0.05). After 12 months, there were no significant differences in these scores between the two groups (both P > 0.05).

conclusionConservative treatment for subacute ATRR following primary Achilles tendon repair yields clinical outcomes comparable to those without ATRR. Therefore, we recommend that surgeons consider relying on the patient's natural healing capabilities rather than opting for aggressive surgical interventions, as expediting such operations may be unnecessary for subacute injuries.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonAnkle InjuriesTendon InjuriesActivities of Daily LivingAnkle JointConservative TreatmentHumansRuptureTreatment OutcomeAchilles tendonAchilles tendon repairAchilles tendon re-ruptureAchilles tendon ruptureConservative treatment

Identifiers

PMID38114740
OpenAlexW4389965811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.