Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114732›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2024

Improving outcome of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: effects of cognitive remediation therapy.

Francesca Martini, Marco Spangaro, Margherita Bechi, Giulia Agostoni, Mariachiara Buonocore, Jacopo Sapienza, Daniela Nocera, Chiara Ave, Federica Cocchi, Roberto Cavallaro and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca Martini *Department of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Marco Spangaro *Department of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. spangaro.marco@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9575-1795
Margherita BechiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giulia AgostoniDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Mariachiara BuonocoreDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Jacopo SapienzaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Daniela NoceraVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Chiara AveVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Federica CocchiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Roberto Cavallaro *Department of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Marta Bosia *Department of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) represents a main clinical issue, associated with worse psychopathological outcomes, a more disrupted neurobiological substrate, and poorer neurocognitive performance across several domains, especially in verbal abilities. If cognitive impairment is a major determinant of patients' functional outcomes and quality of life, targeting cognitive dysfunction becomes even more crucial in TRS patients in order to minimize cognitive and functional deterioration. However, although Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) represents the best available tool to treat cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia, specific evidence of its efficacy in TRS is lacking. Based on these premises, our study aimed at investigating possible differences in CRT outcomes in a sample of 150 patients with schizophrenia, stratified according to antipsychotic response (TRS vs. non-TRS). Subjects were assessed for neurocognition through Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) at baseline and after CRT. As expected, we observed greater baseline impairment among TRS patients in BACS-Verbal Memory and WCST-Executive Functions. Repeated measures ANCOVAs showed significant within-group pre-/post-CRT differences in the above-mentioned domains, both among non-TRS and TRS subjects. However, after CRT, no differences were observed between groups. This is the first study to indicate that CRT represents a highly valuable resource for TRS patients, since it may be able to fill the cognitive gap between treatment response groups. Our finding further highlights the importance of early implementation of CRT in addition to pharmacotherapy to reduce the cognitive and functional burden associated with the disease, especially for TRS patients.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionCognitive RemediationSchizophrenia, Treatment-ResistantAdultAntipsychotic AgentsExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOutcome Assessment, Health CareSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineCognitive impairmentCognitive trainingPsychosisTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID38114732
OpenAlexW4389947632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.