Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114729›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Enhancing domain generalization in the AI-based analysis of chest radiographs with federated learning.

Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Christiane Kuhl, Marwin-Jonathan Saehn, Peter Isfort, Daniel Truhn, Sven Nebelung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soroosh Tayebi ArastehDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. sarasteh@ukaachen.de.
Christiane KuhlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Marwin-Jonathan SaehnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Peter IsfortDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel TruhnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Sven NebelungDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft NE 2136/3-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TR 1700/7-1European Union's Horizon Europe and innovation programme (ODELIA [Open Consortium for Decentralized Medical Artificial Intelligence]) 101057091German Federal Ministry of Education SWAG, 01KD2215BGerman Federal Ministry of Education TRANSFORM LIVER, 031L0312ARadiological Cooperative Network (RACOON) under the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01KX2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing robust artificial intelligence (AI) models that generalize well to unseen datasets is challenging and usually requires large and variable datasets, preferably from multiple institutions. In federated learning (FL), a model is trained collaboratively at numerous sites that hold local datasets without exchanging them. So far, the impact of training strategy, i.e., local versus collaborative, on the diagnostic on-domain and off-domain performance of AI models interpreting chest radiographs has not been assessed. Consequently, using 610,000 chest radiographs from five institutions across the globe, we assessed diagnostic performance as a function of training strategy (i.e., local vs. collaborative), network architecture (i.e., convolutional vs. transformer-based), single versus cross-institutional performance (i.e., on-domain vs. off-domain), imaging finding (i.e., cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, pneumonia, atelectasis, consolidation, pneumothorax, and no abnormality), dataset size (i.e., from n = 18,000 to 213,921 radiographs), and dataset diversity. Large datasets not only showed minimal performance gains with FL but, in some instances, even exhibited decreases. In contrast, smaller datasets revealed marked improvements. Thus, on-domain performance was mainly driven by training data size. However, off-domain performance leaned more on training diversity. When trained collaboratively across diverse external institutions, AI models consistently surpassed models trained locally for off-domain tasks, emphasizing FL's potential in leveraging data diversity. In conclusion, FL can bolster diagnostic privacy, reproducibility, and off-domain reliability of AI models and, potentially, optimize healthcare outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLearningGeneralization, PsychologicalRadiographyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38114729
PMCPMC10730705
OpenAlexW4389954132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.