ArticleThe protein journal2024
Significance of Sequence Features in Classification of Protein-Protein Interactions Using Machine Learning.
Article in The protein journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances and Application of Machine Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction in Rice: Challenges and Future Perspectives.Proteomes · 2025Review
- Feature fusion with attributed deepwalk for protein-protein interaction prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches for predicting protein-ligand binding sites from sequence data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Predicting viral proteins that evade the innate immune system: a machine learning-based immunoinformatics tool.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are crucial for the entry of viruses into the cell. Understanding the mechanism of interactions is essential in studying human-virus association, developing new biologics and drug candidates, as well as viral infections and antiviral responses. Experimental methods to analyze human-virus protein-protein interactions based on protein sequence data are time-consuming and labor-intensive, so machine learning models are being developed to predict interactions and determine large-scale interactomes between species. The present work highlights the importance of sequence features in classifying interacting and non-interacting proteins from the protein sequence data. Higher dimensional amino acid sequence features such as Amino Acid Composition (AAC), Dipeptide Composition (DPC), Grouped Amino Acid Composition (GAAC), Pseudo-Amino Acid Composition (PAAC) etc., are extracted. Following feature extraction, three datasets were created: Dataset 1 contains all of the extracted features. While Datasets 2 and 3 contain the most relevant features obtained through dimensionality reduction. To analyze the importance of high-dimensional features and their participation in protein-protein interactions, a random forest classifier is trained on three datasets. With dimensionality reduction, the model exhibited exceptional accuracy, indicating that dimensionality reduction fails to capture the complexity of interactions and the underlying relationships between human and viral proteins. As a result of retaining high-dimensional features, it is possible to capture all the characteristics of protein-protein interactions that resemble host-pathogen associations, leading to the development of biologically meaningful models. Our proposed approach is a more realistic and comprehensive classification model, leading to deeper insights and better applications in virology and drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.