Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114661›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Rapid seasonal changes in phenotypes in a wild Drosophila population.

Takahisa Ueno, Akiko Takenoshita, Kaiya Hamamichi, Mitsuhiko P Sato, Yuma Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takahisa UenoGraduate School of Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Akiko TakenoshitaFaculty of Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kaiya HamamichiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Mitsuhiko P SatoDepartment of Frontier Research and Development, Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Kisarazu, Japan.
Yuma TakahashiGraduate School of Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. takahashi.yum@gmail.com.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H04857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal environmental change is one of the most rapid and striking environmental variables. Although relatively rapid adaptation to environmental changes over several years or several decades has been described in many taxa, rapid responses to seasonal environments are delicate, and therefore, the detection of the evolutionary responses requires sensitive methods. In this study, we examined seasonal changes in phenotypes related to thermal tolerance and morphological traits of Drosophila lutescens collected at the spring and autumn periods from a single location. We first demonstrated that flies in the two seasonal periods were almost genetically identical using double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing and analysis. Using an experimental design to eliminate the effect of possible confounding factors that influence phenotypes (i.e., maternal effects and the environmental conditions in which each phenotype was analyzed), we showed that the heat tolerance of D. lutescens was significantly higher in the autumn population than in the spring population. Furthermore, cold tolerance was slightly higher in the spring population than in the autumn one. Although wing length and thorax length did not change significantly between seasons, the ratio of wing length to thorax length changed significantly between them. These results suggest that seasonal environmental heterogeneity induces rapid phenotypic changes within a year. Finally, we discuss the possibility of rapid evolutionary responses to seasonal changes.

Indexed as

DrosophilaAnimalsPhenotypeSeasons

Identifiers

PMID38114661
PMCPMC10730618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.