Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114635›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Machine learning based outcome prediction of microsurgically treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Nico Stroh, Harald Stefanits, Alexander Maletzky, Sophie Kaltenleithner, Stefan Thumfart, Michael Giretzlehner, Richard Drexler, Franz L Ricklefs, Lasse Dührsen, Stefan Aspalter and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nico StrohDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Harald StefanitsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria. harald.stefanits@kepleruniklinikum.at.
Alexander MaletzkyRISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria.
Sophie KaltenleithnerRISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria.
Stefan ThumfartRISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria.
Michael GiretzlehnerRISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria.
Richard DrexlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Franz L RicklefsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lasse DührsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan AspalterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Philip RauchDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Andreas GruberDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Matthias GmeinerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
RISC Software (Austria) · ATUniversität Hamburg · DEKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has revolutionized data processing in recent years. This study presents the results of the first prediction models based on a long-term monocentric data registry of patients with microsurgically treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) using a temporal train-test split. Temporal train-test splits allow to simulate prospective validation, and therefore provide more accurate estimations of a model's predictive quality when applied to future patients. ML models for the prediction of the Glasgow outcome scale, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and new transient or permanent neurological deficits (output variables) were created from all UIA patients that underwent microsurgery at the Kepler University Hospital Linz (Austria) between 2002 and 2020 (n = 466), based on 18 patient- and 10 aneurysm-specific preoperative parameters (input variables). Train-test splitting was performed with a temporal split for outcome prediction in microsurgical therapy of UIA. Moreover, an external validation was conducted on an independent external data set (n = 256) of the Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf. In total, 722 aneurysms were included in this study. A postoperative mRS > 2 was best predicted by a quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) estimator in the internal test set, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.87 ± 0.03 and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.83 ± 0.08 and 0.71 ± 0.07, respectively. A Multilayer Perceptron predicted the post- to preoperative mRS difference > 1 with a ROC-AUC of 0.70 ± 0.02 and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.74 ± 0.07 and 0.50 ± 0.04, respectively. The QDA was the best model for predicting a permanent new neurological deficit with a ROC-AUC of 0.71 ± 0.04 and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.65 ± 0.24 and 0.60 ± 0.12, respectively. Furthermore, these models performed significantly better than the classic logistic regression models (p < 0.0001). The present results showed good performance in predicting functional and clinical outcomes after microsurgical therapy of UIAs in the internal data set, especially for the main outcome parameters, mRS and permanent neurological deficit. The external validation showed poor discrimination with ROC-AUC values of 0.61, 0.53 and 0.58 respectively for predicting a postoperative mRS > 2, a pre- and postoperative difference in mRS > 1 point and a GOS < 5. Therefore, generalizability of the models could not be demonstrated in the external validation. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that this is due to the most important features being distributed quite differently in the internal and external data sets. The implementation of newly available data and the merging of larger databases to form more broad-based predictive models is imperative in the future.

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMachine LearningNeurosurgical ProceduresPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38114635
PMCPMC10730905
OpenAlexW4389936216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.