Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114616›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Multicenter development of a PET-based risk assessment tool for product-specific outcome prediction in large B-cell lymphoma patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy.

Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Andrea Paccagnella, Michael Winkelmann, Jan-Michel Heger, Beatrice Casadei, Laura Beckmann, Ken Herrmann, Franziska J Dekorsy, Nadine Kutsch, Peter Borchmann and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The prognostic utility ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Standardized FDG-PET interpretation during CAR T-cell therapy in R/R DLBCL: a DESCAR-T study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictive value of maximum tumor dissemination (Dmax) in lymphoma patients treated with CD19-specific CAR T-Cells.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Conrad-Amadeus VoltinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. conrad-amadeus.voltin@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5437-3959
Andrea PaccagnellaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Michael WinkelmannDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan-Michel HegerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Beatrice CasadeiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Laura BeckmannDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Franziska J DekorsyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nadine KutschDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Peter BorchmannDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefano FantiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marion SubkleweDepartment of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM), University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carsten KobeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Pier Luigi ZinzaniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Matthias StelljesDepartment of Medicine A-Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology, West German Cancer Center (WTZ) Network Partner Site, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Katrin S RothDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander DrzezgaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Richard NoppeneyGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Kambiz RahbarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
H Christian ReinhardtGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Bastian von TresckowGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Robert SeifertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jörn C AlbringDepartment of Medicine A-Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology, West German Cancer Center (WTZ) Network Partner Site, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Viktoria BlumenbergDepartment of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM), University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrea FarolfiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (IRCCS) 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna', University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sarah FlossdorfInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Philipp Gödel *Department of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christine Hanoun *German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Bologna · ITLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Münster · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

German Research Foundation 451580403Wilhelm Sander Foundation 2018.087.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fundamentally changed the management of individuals with relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, real-world data have shown divergent outcomes for the approved products. The present study therefore set out to evaluate potential risk factors in a larger cohort.

methodsOur analysis set included 88 patients, treated in four German university hospitals and one Italian center, who had undergone 2-[

resultsExtra-nodal involvement emerged as the most relevant of the conventional tumor and patient characteristics. Moreover, we found that inclusion of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) further improves outcome prediction. The hazard ratio for a PFS event was 1.68 per unit increase of our proposed risk score (95% confidence interval [1.20, 2.35], P = 0.003), which comprised both extra-nodal disease and lymphoma burden. While the most suitable MTV cut-off among patients receiving tisagenlecleucel was 11 mL, a markedly higher threshold of 259 mL showed optimal predictive performance in those undergoing axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment.

conclusionOur analysis demonstrates that the presence of more than one extra-nodal lesion and higher MTV in LBCL are associated with inferior outcome after CAR T-cell treatment. Based on an assessment tool including these two factors, patients can be assigned to one of three risk groups. Importantly, as shown by our study, metabolic tumor burden might facilitate CAR T-cell product selection and reflect the individual need for bridging therapy.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRisk AssessmentCAR T-cell therapyExtra-nodal involvementLarge B-cell lymphomaMTVRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38114616
PMCPMC10957657
OpenAlexW4390012617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.