Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114331›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2023

State-dependent memory retrieval: insights from neural dynamics and behavioral perspectives.

Fei Wang, Xu Chen, Binshi Bo, Tianfu Zhang, Kaiyuan Liu, Jun Jiang, Yonggang Wang, Hong Xie, Zhifeng Liang, Ji-Song Guan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fei Wang *School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Xu Chen *School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Binshi Bo *Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Sciences and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Tianfu ZhangSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Kaiyuan LiuSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Jun JiangSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Yonggang WangHeadache Center, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China.
Hong XieInstitute of Photonic Chips, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China guanjs@shanghaitech.edu.cn zliang@ion.ac.cn hongxie@usst.edu.cn.
Zhifeng LiangInstitute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Sciences and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China guanjs@shanghaitech.edu.cn zliang@ion.ac.cn hongxie@usst.edu.cn.
Ji-Song GuanSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China guanjs@shanghaitech.edu.cn zliang@ion.ac.cn hongxie@usst.edu.cn.
ShanghaiTech University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNCapital Medical University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory retrieval is strikingly susceptible to external states (environment) and internal states (mood states and alcohol), yet we know little about the underlying mechanisms. We examined how internally generated states influence successful memory retrieval using the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of laboratory mice during memory retrieval. Mice exhibited a strong tendency to perform memory retrieval correctly only in the reinstated mammillary body-inhibited state, in which mice were trained to discriminate auditory stimuli in go/no-go tasks. fMRI revealed that distinct auditory cues engaged differential brain regions, which were primed by internal state. Specifically, a cue associated with a reward activated the lateral amygdala, while a cue signaling no reward predominantly activated the postsubiculum. Modifying these internal states significantly altered the neural activity balance between these regions. Optogenetic inhibition of those regions in the precue period blocked the retrieval of type-specific memories. Our findings suggest that memory retrieval is under the control of two interrelated neural circuits underlying the neural basis of state-dependent memory retrieval.

Indexed as

BrainMemoryAnimalsBrain MappingCuesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMice

Identifiers

PMID38114331
PMCPMC10750866
OpenAlexW4389943215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.