Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114280›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Influence of perioperative step volume on complication rate and length of hospital stay after colorectal cancer surgery (IPOS trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled single-centre trial at a German university hospital.

Lena Anthuber, Florian Sommer, Sebastian Wolf, Dmytro Vlasenko, Michael Hoffmann, Tim Tobias Arndt, Stefan Schiele, Matthias Anthuber, Matthias Christian Schrempf

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lena Anthuber *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Florian Sommer *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Sebastian WolfDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5298-8901
Dmytro VlasenkoDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Michael HoffmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Tim Tobias ArndtDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan SchieleDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Matthias AnthuberDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Matthias Christian Schrempf *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany matthias.schrempf@uk-augsburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2220-6427
University Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative mobilisation and physical activity are critical components of postoperative rehabilitation. Physical inactivity is a significant risk factor for complications and prolonged hospitalisation. However, specific recommendations for preoperative and postoperative physical activity levels are currently lacking. Evidence suggests that daily step count before and after surgery may impact the length of hospital stay and complication rate.The goal of this study is to determine the effectiveness of perioperative step volume recommendations, measured by pedometers, in reducing the length of hospital stay and complication rate for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

methodsThis study is a single-centre randomised controlled trial with two arms, allocated at a 1:1 ratio. The trial includes individuals undergoing colorectal surgery for either suspected or confirmed colorectal malignancy. A total of 222 patients will be randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. Step counts will be measured using a pedometer. Patients assigned to the intervention group will be given a predetermined preoperative and postoperative step count goal. The analysis will be conducted on preoperative and postoperative physical activity, quality of life, health, duration of hospitalisation, complication rate and bowel function, among other factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany (reference number: 22-0758, protocol version 2022.02). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared at academic conferences. After the publication of the results, a fully anonymised data set and the statistical code can be made available on justified scientific request and after ethical approval has been granted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00030017.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsHospitalsHumansLength of StayQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicColorectal surgeryGastrointestinal tumoursONCOLOGYREHABILITATION MEDICINESURGERY

Identifiers

PMID38114280
OpenAlexW4389976573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.