ArticleBMJ open quality2023
Nurse-led sustainable plastic surgery trauma service transformation: a positive COVID-19 legacy.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of nurse-led versus traditional trauma services in plastic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Eco-audit of the Nail Bed Injury Treatment Pathway at a Tertiary Care Hospital.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this quality improvement was to develop a sustainable nurse-led 'See and Treat' service in a regional plastic surgery unit in England for patients requiring plastic surgery under local anaesthetic following traumatic injury.Trauma-related injuries are a substantial part of the workload in the plastic surgery department in question; with people with the most minor injuries requiring surgery under local anaesthetic accounting for 17%. COVID-19 threatened the continuation of any minor surgery service, but the initial crisis-driven response to the pandemic provided the opportunity to develop a new, more effective, nurse-led service for this patient group.The Model for Improvement was used and four 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' cycles deployed over an 8-week period, involving 102 patients. Routine quantitative and qualitative data in the form of a semistructured patient feedback proforma were used to guide the improvement process, optimising the new service design and delivery.The results demonstrated that 98% (n=100) of patients received same-day surgery via the new 'See and Treat' service. Staff and patient satisfaction remained high throughout; all patients preferred same-day surgery. No negative unintended consequences, for example, postoperative infections, were identified. One positive unintended consequence was the reduction in carbon footprint achieved by decreasing clinical waste and patient travel.Improvement methodology was successfully used by a nurse-led team to enable the continuation and enhancement of surgical services for trauma patients during COVID-19-driven service disruption. This service transformation has resulted in the retention of the revised service delivery model as the 'new normal' approximately 2 years later. The COVID-19 pandemic challenged the resilience of the trauma surgery service but led to a positive long-term legacy that sustainably improved waiting times and patient experience while maintaining safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.