ArticleBMJ open quality2023
Opportunities to improve opioid use disorder care for hospitalised patients with endocarditis.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDriven by increased injection opioid use, rates of hospitalisation for infective endocarditis, an infection associated with injection drug use, are increasing. In the USA, 1 in 10 hospitalised patients for opioid use disorder-associated infective endocarditis (OUD-IE) die in the hospital and 1 in 20 have a patient-directed discharge. Emerging models of care reveal opportunities for healthcare systems to meet the complex care needs of these patients. We characterised promising practices of staff who care for these patients and identified areas for improvement.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study with 1-hour semistructured virtual interviews between October 2021 and March 2022. Participants included 26 healthcare staff who care for patients with OUD-IE at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. We used thematic analysis of interviews guided by an abductive approach. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed and analysed using NVivo software.
resultsInterviews were characterised by three major themes: (1) care rooted in interdisciplinary collaboration; (2) managing OUD and its sequelae in a setting not designed to treat OUD; and (3) clinician needs and barriers to change.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the facilitators of high-quality treatment for patients with OUD-IE, as well as the key areas for improvement. Findings add context to the complexity that both the healthcare staff and patients navigate during and following hospitalisation for OUD-IE. Needed changes include training staff to talk with patients about preparing for a return to drug use following hospitalisation, and changing discharge facilities' practices that hinder access for patients with OUD-IE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38114244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.