Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38114192›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Short-term and long-term behavioral effects of vaccination mandates.

Onur Baser, Katarzyna Rodchenko, Lu Chen, Nehir Yapar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Onur BaserDepartment of Economics, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Katarzyna RodchenkoHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Columbia Data Analytics, New York, NY, USA.
Lu ChenHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Columbia Data Analytics, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nehir YaparHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Columbia Data Analytics, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current COVID-19 vaccination levels are insufficient to achieve herd immunity. To implement effective interventions toward ending the pandemic, it is essential to understand why people are motivated and willing to receive vaccination. The study aims to evaluate attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination mandates and the impact of policies on future vaccine uptake and behavior utilizing self-determination theory. We conducted an online survey (

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansIntentionMotivationVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinesexternal motivationpsychological needsself-determination theoryVaccination mandate

Identifiers

PMID38114192
PMCPMC10732688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.