Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38113943›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Ripple effects in a communication network: anti-eavesdropper defence elicits elaborated sexual signals in rival males.

Brian C Leavell, Hoover Pantoja-Sánchez, Viviana Vélez, Claire T Hemingway, Kyle Wilhite, Wouter Halfwerk, Ximena E Bernal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian C LeavellDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-9309
Hoover Pantoja-SánchezDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Viviana VélezProgram of Study and Control of Tropical Diseases, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Claire T HemingwayDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Kyle WilhiteDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-3966
Wouter HalfwerkDepartment of Ecological Science, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4111-0930
Ximena E BernalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6155-5980

Funding

National Science Foundation DGE-1842166National Science Foundation IOS-1433990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emitting conspicuous signals into the environment to attract mates comes with the increased risk of interception by eavesdropping enemies. As a defence, a commonly described strategy is for signallers to group together in leks, diluting each individual's risk. Lekking systems are often highly social settings in which competing males dynamically alter their signalling behaviour to attract mates. Thus, signalling at the lek requires navigating fluctuations in risk, competition and reproductive opportunities. Here, we investigate how behavioural defence strategies directed at an eavesdropping enemy have cascading effects across the communication network. We investigated these behaviours in the túngara frog (

Indexed as

ChiropteraVocalization, AnimalAnimalsAnuraFemaleMalePredatory BehaviorReproductionSexual Behavior, Animalcommunicationforagingmale–male competitionpredator–preysexual selectionvibratory cue

Identifiers

PMID38113943
PMCPMC10730286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.