Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38113668›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2024

Beyond strategies: The when and why of emotion regulation in aging.

Derek M Isaacowitz, Tammy English

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Derek M IsaacowitzDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, United States. Electronic address: dmi@neu.edu.
Tammy EnglishDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, United States.
Northeastern University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Neural and motivational mechanisms of age-related change in emotion regulation: Administrative SupplementR01AG070139 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ENGLISH, TAMMY, THOMPSON, RENEE J · 2021 to 2025
$4.3M
Emotion Regulation in Adulthood and Aging: Preference and EffectivenessR56AG048731 · NIA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ISAACOWITZ, DEREK M · 2020 to 2020
$496k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070139NIA NIH HHS R56 AG048731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most research to date on potential age differences in emotion regulation has focused on whether older adults differ from younger adults in how they manage their emotions. We argue for a broader consideration of the possible effects of aging on emotion regulation by moving beyond tests of age differences in strategy use to also consider when and why emotion regulation takes place. That is, we encourage deeper consideration of contextual factors that spark regulation as well as the goals and motives underlying individuals' attempts to regulate their emotions. There may be age-related variation in all, some, or none of these components of emotion regulation. Descriptive work across all dimensions of emotion regulation is necessary to test and refine theories of emotional aging.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationAgedAgingEmotionsHumansMotivation

Identifiers

PMID38113668
PMCPMC10939930
OpenAlexW4388948287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.