Trial reportBlood advances2024
A phase 2 study of the PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib in relapsed and refractory marginal zone lymphoma (CITADEL-204).
Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03144674 (A Phase 2, Open-Label, 2-Cohort Study of INCB050465, a PI3Kδ Inhibitor, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma With or Without Prior Exposure to a BTK Inhibitor), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Open-Label, 2-Cohort Study of INCB050465, a PI3Kδ Inhibitor, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma With or Without Prior Exposure to a BTK Inhibitor (CITADEL-204)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- PI3Kδ Inhibitor Parsaclisib in Japanese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.Cancer science · 2025Trial
- A phase II study of zandelisib in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: ME-401-K02 study.British journal of haematology · 2025Trial
- Treatment patterns in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: real-world evidence from seven countries.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Optimizing anti-PI3Kδ and anti-LAG-3 immunotherapy dosing regimens in a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer improves outcome by removing treatment-related adverse events.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Current and Emerging Novel Treatments for Marginal Zone Lymphoma.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2026Review
- The Development of Novel Therapies for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia in the Era of Targeted Drugs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Novel targeted drugs for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- The MAGNOLIA Trial: Zanubrutinib, a Next-Generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy in Relapsed/Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractParsaclisib, a potent and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, has shown clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphomas. The phase 2 CITADEL-204 study (NCT03144674, EudraCT 2017-000970-12) assessed efficacy and safety of parsaclisib in Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor-experienced (cohort 1) or BTK inhibitor-naive (cohort 2) patients with R/R marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed R/R MZL, treated with ≥1 prior systemic therapy (including ≥1 anti-CD20 antibody) received parsaclisib 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks then 20 mg once weekly (weekly dosing group [WG]) or parsaclisib 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks then 2.5 mg once daily (daily dosing group [DG]); DG was selected for further assessment. Primary end point of the study was objective response rate (ORR). Owing to slower than expected recruitment, cohort 1 was closed with 10 patients (WG, n = 4; DG, n = 6) enrolled. Based on a planned interim analysis in cohort 2, the futility boundary was not crossed, and enrollment continued to study completion. At data cutoff (15 January 2021), 100 patients were enrolled and treated in cohort 2 (WG, n = 28; DG, n = 72). In the DG, the ORR was 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1-69.8), with a complete response rate of 4.2% (95% CI, 0.9-11.7); the lower bound of the ORR 95% CI exceeded the protocol-defined threshold of 40%. The median duration of response was 12.2 months (95% CI, 8.1-17.5) and progression-free survival was 16.5 months (95% CI, 11.5-20.6); median overall survival was not reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among all patients were diarrhea (47.0%), cough (23.0%), and rash (18.0%); the most common grade ≥3 TEAEs included diarrhea (12.0%), neutropenia, and pneumonia (9.0% each). TEAEs led to dose interruptions, reductions, and discontinuations in 56.0%, 16.0%, and 29.0% of all patients, respectively. Durable responses and an overall manageable safety profile were demonstrated in patients with R/R MZL treated with parsaclisib monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.