Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38113264›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Increased cortical inhibition following brief motor memory reactivation supports reconsolidation and overnight offline learning gains.

Tamir Eisenstein, Edna Furman-Haran, Assaf Tal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamir EisensteinDepartment of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Edna Furman-HaranLife Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Assaf TalDepartment of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for the Early Detection of Neurodegeneration in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisR21NS112853 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KIROV, IVAN IVANOV, TAL, ASSAF · 2019 to 2019
$417k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS112853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practicing motor skills stabilizes and strengthens motor memories by repeatedly reactivating and reconsolidating them. The conventional view, by which a repetitive practice is required for substantially improving skill performance, has been recently challenged by behavioral experiments, in which even brief reactivations of the motor memory have led to significant improvements in skill performance. However, the mechanisms which facilitate brief reactivation-induced skill improvements remain elusive. While initial memory consolidation has been repeatedly associated with increased neural excitation and disinhibition, reconsolidation has been shown to involve a poorly understood mixture of both excitatory and inhibitory alterations. Here, we followed a 3-d reactivation-reconsolidation framework to examine whether the excitatory/inhibitory mechanisms which underlie brief reactivation and repetitive practice differ. Healthy volunteers practiced a motor sequence learning task using either brief reactivation or repetitive practice and were assessed using ultrahigh field (7T) magnetic resonance spectroscopy at the primary motor cortex (M1). We found that increased inhibition (GABA concentrations) and decreased excitation/inhibition (glutamate/GABA ratios) immediately following the brief reactivation were associated with overnight offline performance gains. These gains were on par with those exhibited following repetitive practice, where no correlations with inhibitory or excitatory changes were observed. Our findings suggest that brief reactivation and repetitive practice depend on fundamentally different neural mechanisms and that early inhibition-and not excitation-is particularly important in supporting the learning gains exhibited by brief reactivation.

Indexed as

LearningMemory Consolidationgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMotor Skillsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGABAmagnetic resonance spectroscopymotor learningreactivationreconsolidation

Identifiers

PMID38113264
PMCPMC10756311
OpenAlexW4389944772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.