Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38113067›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2023

Key Features of Smart Medication Adherence Products: Updated Scoping Review.

Sadaf Faisal, Devine Samoth, Yusra Aslam, Hawa Patel, SooMin Park, Bincy Baby, Tejal Patel

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The effect of reminder mobile application use on medication adherence after total thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How Digital Health Technology Is Extending Independent Living.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sadaf FaisalSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-2194
Devine SamothSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3963-2475
Yusra AslamSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2966-0856
Hawa PatelSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5096-1282
SooMin ParkSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5420-616X
Bincy BabySchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6778-4708
Tejal PatelSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3002-8306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults often face challenges in self-managing their medication owing to physical and cognitive limitations, complex medication regimens, and packaging of medications. Emerging smart medication dispensing and adherence products (SMAPs) offer the options of automated dispensing, tracking medication intake in real time, and reminders and notifications. A 2021 review identified 51 SMAPs owing to the rapid influx of digital technology; an update to this review is required.

objectiveThis review aims to identify new products and summarize and compare the key features of SMAPs.

methodsGray and published literature and videos were searched using Google, YouTube, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The first 10 pages of Google and the first 100 results of YouTube were screened using 4 and 5 keyword searches, respectively. SMAPs were included if they were able to store and allowed for the dispensation of medications, tracked real-time medication intake data, and could automatically analyze data. Products were excluded if they were stand-alone software applications, not marketed in English, not for in-home use, or only used in clinical trials. In total, 5 researchers independently screened and extracted the data.

resultsThis review identified 114 SMAPs, including 80 (70.2%) marketed and 34 (29.8%) prototypes, grouped into 15 types. Among the marketed products, 68% (54/80) were available for consumer purchase. Of these products, 26% (14/54) were available worldwide and 78% (42/54) were available in North America. There was variability in the hardware, software, data collection and management features, and cost of the products. Examples of hardware features include battery life, medication storage capacity, availability of types and number of alarms, locking features, and additional technology required for use of the product, whereas software features included reminder and notification capabilities and availability of manufacturer support. Data capture methods included the availability of sensors to record the use of the product and data-syncing capabilities with cloud storage with short-range communications. Data were accessible to users via mobile apps or web-based portals. Some SMAPs provided data security assurance with secure log-ins (use of personal identification numbers or facial recognition), whereas other SMAPs provided data through registered email addresses. Although some SMAPs were available at set prices or free of cost to end users, the cost of other products varied based on availability, shipping fees, and subscription fees.

conclusionsAn expanding market for SMAPs with features specific to at-home patient use is emerging. Health care professionals can use these features to select and suggest products that meet their patients' unique requirements.

Indexed as

adherenceagingapplicationappsconsumerdigital healthdigital technologygeriatricsmanagementmedicationmedication adherencemHealthmHealth appmobile healthmobile phoneolder adultolder adultsscoping reviewself-managementsmart medicationtechnologyuse

Identifiers

PMID38113067
PMCPMC10762620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.