Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38112985›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2024

Current Review of Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Spine-Related Pain.

Jillian Maloney, N Strand, C Wie, S Pew, A Dawodu, T Dunn, B Johnson, A Eells, O Viswanath, J Freeman and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Orthobiologic Management Options for Degenerative Disc Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian MaloneyMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA. maloney.jillian@mayo.edu.
N StrandMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
C WieMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
S PewMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
A DawoduMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
T DunnMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
B JohnsonMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
A EellsMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
O ViswanathInnovative Pain and Wellness, LSU Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J FreemanMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
S CovingtonMayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Mayo Clinic Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USCreighton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPersistent spinal pain syndromes are pervasive and lead to functional impairment, increased healthcare utilization, potential disability, and high societal costs. Spinal (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacroiliac joint) pain includes mechanical, degenerative, inflammatory, oncologic, and infectious etiologies. Regenerative medicine is a novel biotechnology targeting mechanical, degenerative, and inflammatory conditions believed to cause pain. Preparations including platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cells (adipose tissue and bone marrow aspirate concentrates), and growth factors are derived from an autologous donor. The goal of intervention through guided injection of the regenerative media is to reduce inflammation and reverse the degenerative cascade in hopes of restoring normal cellular composition (physiologic homeostasis) and anatomical function to improve pain and function. The authors review limited research supporting the use of platelet-rich plasma injections for facet joint arthropathy and sacroiliac joint pain compared to traditional steroid treatments, as well as the use of platelet rich plasma or mesenchymal stem cells for lumbar discogenic and radicular pain. RECENT

findingsCurrent evidence to support regenerative medicine for spine-related pain is limited. Although several studies demonstrated a reduction in pain, many of these studies had a small number of participants and were case series or prospective trials. Regenerative medicine treatments lack evidence for the treatment of spine-related pain. Large randomized controlled trials are needed with consistent study protocols to make further recommendations.

Indexed as

Regenerative MedicineHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPain ManagementPlatelet-Rich PlasmaMesenchymal stem cellsPlatelet-rich plasmaRegenerative medicineSpine-related pain

Identifiers

PMID38112985
OpenAlexW4389981389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.