Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38112891›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2024

What do emergency department pharmacist practitioners know and understand about patient safeguarding? A qualitative study.

Daniel Greenwood, Douglas Steinke, Sandra Martin, Gary Norton, Mary P Tully

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel GreenwoodDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. dan.greenwood@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7895-8292
Douglas SteinkeDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Sandra MartinDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Gary NortonDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Mary P TullyDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists with additional clinical skills now work in UK emergency departments. Known as Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners, the role was developed in response to a shortage of physicians and nurses. They carry out activities typical of traditional hospital pharmacists, but also novel 'practitioner' activities such as examining patients, and acting as designated care provider. The role includes a responsibility to safeguard patients from harm. Professional competence, i.e. to safeguard patients, is underpinned by knowledge of the subject, but also knowledge application.

aimTo investigate what Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners know and understand about safeguarding vulnerable children and adults.

methodThirteen Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners were interviewed to explore their knowledge and understanding of safeguarding. Interview questions were developed from review of relevant literature, as were vignettes with variables identified and altered to produce different scenarios. Template analysis was used to code data to a priori themes for each of the stages of the initial safeguarding process, and new themes that emerged throughout the process.

resultsSix themes were identified in addition to the four a priori themes. Overall, participants frequently described how safeguarding concerns are both recognised and responded to, but seemed more comfortable when responding to medicines related concerns. Factors thought to influence the safeguarding process included: resources and setting; and education, training and experiential learning; and culture.

conclusionWhile Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners interviewed were aware of the safeguarding process, there were some misconceptions as to the roles of different healthcare workers in this process.

Indexed as

PharmacistsPhysiciansAdultChildClinical CompetenceEmergency Service, HospitalHumansProfessional RoleQualitative ResearchEducationEmergency serviceHospitalMaltreatmentPharmacistsSafeguarding

Identifiers

PMID38112891
PMCPMC10830784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.