Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38112879›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Impact of clinicians' behavior, an educational intervention with mandated blood pressure and the hypotension prediction index software on intraoperative hypotension: a mixed methods study.

Ilonka N de Keijzer, Jaap Jan Vos, David Yates, Caroline Reynolds, Sally Moore, Rebecca J Lawton, Thomas W L Scheeren, Simon J Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Accuracy of Quantifying Hypotension During Surgery Using Physiological Sensor Data.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Goal-directed therapy: what is the goal again?Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilonka N de KeijzerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands. i.n.de.keijzer@umcg.nl.
Jaap Jan VosDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands.
David YatesDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Centre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
Caroline ReynoldsBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Sally MooreBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Rebecca J LawtonUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Thomas W L ScheerenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands.
Simon J DaviesDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Centre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBHanze University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with adverse outcomes. We therefore explored beliefs regarding IOH and barriers to its treatment. Secondarily, we assessed if an educational intervention and mandated mean arterial pressure (MAP), or the implementation of the Hypotension Prediction Index-software (HPI) were associated with a reduction in IOH.

methodsStructured interviews (n = 27) and questionnaires (n = 84) were conducted to explore clinicians' beliefs and barriers to IOH treatment, in addition to usefulness of HPI questionnaires (n = 14). 150 elective major surgical patients who required invasive blood pressure monitoring were included in three cohorts to assess incidence and time-weighted average (TWA) of hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg). Cohort one received standard care (baseline), the clinicians of cohort two had a training on hypotension and a mandated MAP > 65 mmHg, and patients of the third cohort received protocolized care using the HPI.

resultsClinicians felt challenged to manage IOH in some patients, yet they reported sufficient knowledge and skills. HPI-software was considered useful and beneficial. No difference was found in incidence of IOH between cohorts. TWA was comparable between baseline and education cohort (0.15 mmHg [0.05-0.41] vs. 0.11 mmHg [0.02-0.37]), but was significantly lower in the HPI cohort (0.04 mmHg [0.00 to 0.11], p < 0.05 compared to both).

conclusionsClinicians believed they had sufficient knowledge and skills, which could explain why no difference was found after the educational intervention. In the HPI cohort, IOH was significantly reduced compared to baseline, therefore HPI-software may help prevent IOH.

trial registrationISRCTN 17,085,700 on May 9th, 2019.

Indexed as

HypotensionIntraoperative ComplicationsBlood PressureCohort StudiesHumansSoftwareBlood pressure managementHemodynamic monitoringHypotension Prediction IndexIntraoperative hypotension

Identifiers

PMID38112879
PMCPMC10995090
OpenAlexW4389980297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.