Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38112799›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Evaluating quality of life in pediatric palliative care: a cross-sectional analysis of children's and parents' perspectives.

Daniel Toro-Pérez, Joaquin T Limonero, Montserrat Guillen, Catalina Bolancé, Sergi Navarro Vilarrubí, Ester Camprodon-Rosanas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Toro-PérezSchool of Psychology, Stress and Health Research Group, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. toroperez.dani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-9976
Joaquin T LimoneroSchool of Psychology, Stress and Health Research Group, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0573-791X
Montserrat GuillenDepartment of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2644-6268
Catalina BolancéDepartment of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5982-1538
Sergi Navarro VilarrubíPalliative Care and Complex Chronic Patient Service (C2P2), Sant Joan de Déu Hospital in Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-8991
Ester Camprodon-RosanasChildren and Adolescent Mental Health Research Group, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0170-1717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patient's perspective is an essential component of understanding the individual experience of suffering in children with palliative needs, but it is a perspective that is often overlooked. The aim of this study was to compare the perception of quality of life (QoL) of children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions expressed by the children themselves and their parents. Through a cross-sectional study, the responses of 44 parent-child dyads were obtained and the analysis was performed with the statistics based on Student's t distribution and non-parametric tests. Children value QoL more positively (mean = 6.95, SD = 1.85) than their parents (mean = 5.39, SD = 2.43). This difference exists even if we consider sociodemographic and disease variables. The presence of exacerbated symptoms is the situation in which both parents (mean = 3.70; SD = 1.95) and children (mean = 5.60; SD = 1.17) evaluate QoL more negatively.

conclusionsChildren have a more optimistic view than their parents. When the child is the one who reports a lower QoL score than their parent, the child should be carefully monitored. The voice of the child and that of the family members can be collected to create a "family voice" and can be complementary. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children with life-limiting conditions experience multiple and changing symptoms that affect their QoL. • The child's perspective is often overlooked. WHAT IS NEW: • Children value QoL more positively than their parents do, even if we control for sociodemographic variables and the disease itself. • When the child is the one who reports a lower QoL score than their parent, the child should be carefully monitored.

Indexed as

Palliative CareQuality of LifeChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenLife-limiting conditionsParentsPediatric palliativePsychological assessmentQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38112799
PMCPMC10951001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.