Observational studyRevista de neurologia2024
[A multicentre epilepsy registry in Mexico].
Observational study in Revista de neurologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world Data on Adult Status Epilepticus from Latin America: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in a Mexican Tertiary Center.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Recurrence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Trends in prescription of new antiseizure medications in a single center in Latin America: evidence of clinical practice.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- [Characteristics of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary hospital].Revista de neurologia · 2024Article
- [Etiology of epilepsy in Mexico: results from the national multi-centre register].Revista de neurologia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe National Epilepsy Registry in Mexico was carried out, from March 2021 to December 2022, in public hospitals of the Priority Epilepsy Program 'PPE', with the aim of describing the current situation in our pediatric and adult population. PATIENTS AND
methodsObservational, cross-sectional, multicenter study. We used a database, according to classifications of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 2017. Patients of all ages were included, with a diagnosis of epilepsy according to the practical clinical definition ILAE 2014.
resultsWe registered 10,852 patients, 5,495 men (50.6%) and 5,357 women (49.4%). Family history of epilepsy in 1,714 patients (15.8%), febrile seizures in 987 (9.1%). Type of seizure: 5,542 (51.1%) presented focal onset, of which 1,889 (34.1%) evolved to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures; generalized onset 4,861 (44.8%), unknown 33 (3.1%) and unclassified 115 (1.1%). Almost half had unknown etiology and 40% were structural, of which hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy was the most frequent (21.6%) and neurocysticercosis was 1%. Comorbidities appeared in 6,326 patients (58.3%). Anti-seizure medications (ASM) were used in 96.4% patients, mainly valproate. Status epilepticus was found in 1,383 patients (12.7%) and drug-resistant epilepsy in 18.9%. Paraclinical studies: 79.3% with at least one electroencephalogram and 76.9% with a neuroimaging study. Epilepsy surgery occurred in 275 patients (2.5%).
conclusionsDespite the efforts of the Pan American Health Organization in its Strategy and Action Plan on epilepsy, diagnostic technologies and ASM supply are still lagging behind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.