Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38112496›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Establishing Fully-Automated Fundus-Controlled Dark Adaptometry: A Validation and Retest-Reliability Study.

Jeannine M Oertli, Kristina Pfau, Hendrik P N Scholl, Brett G Jeffrey, Maximilian Pfau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07515521 (Enhanced Vision and Imaging Tests for Enabling Treatment Trials in Early and Intermediate AMD), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07515521 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Enhanced Vision and Imaging Tests for Enabling Treatment Trials in Early and Intermediate AMD

TypeobservationalSponsorMaximilian PfauRan2026 to 2028Enrolled150ConditionsAge - Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeannine M OertliDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Kristina PfauDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hendrik P N SchollDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Brett G JeffreyOphthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Maximilian PfauDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CHNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish and validate a novel fundus-controlled dark-adaptometry method. Methods: We developed a custom dark-adaptometry software for the S-MAIA device using the open-perimetry-interface. In the validation-substudy, participants underwent dark-adaptometry testing with a comparator device (MonCvONE, 59% rhodopsin bleach, cyan and red stimuli centered at 2 degrees, 4 degrees, and 6 degrees eccentricity). Following a brief break (approximately 5 minutes), the participants were bleached again and underwent dark-adaptometry testing with the S-MAIA device (same loci). In the retest reliability-substudy, participants were tested twice with the S-MAIA device (same loci as above). Nonlinear curve fitting was applied to extract dark-adaptation curve parameters. Validity and repeatability were summarized in terms of the mean bias and 95% limits of agreement (LoAs). Results: In the validation-substudy (N = 20 participants, median age interquartile range [IQR] 31.5 years [IQR = 25.8, 62.0]), measures of rod-mediated dark-adaptation showed little to no between method differences for the cone-rod-break-time (bias 95% confidence interval [95% CI] of +0.1 minutes [95% CI = -0.6 to 0.8]), rod-intercept-time (-0.23 minutes [95% CI = -1.38 to 0.93]), and S2 slope (-0.01 LogUnits/minutes [95% CI = -0.02 to -0.01]). In the retest reliability-substudy (N = 10 participants, 32.0 years [95% CI = 27.0, 57.5]), the corresponding LoAs were (cone-rod-break-time) -3.94 to 2.78 minutes, (rod-intercept-time) -4.55 to 3.11 minutes, and (S2 slope [rate-limited component of rod recovery]) -0.03 to 0.03 LogUnits/minutes. The LoAs for the steady-state cone and rod thresholds were -0.28 to 0.33 LogUnits and -0.34 to 0.28 LogUnits. Conclusions: The devised fundus-controlled dark-adaptometry method yields valid and reliable results. Translational Relevance: Fundus-controlled dark-adaptometry solves the critical need for localized testing of the visual cycle and retinoid transfer in eyes with unstable fixation.

Indexed as

Retinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsAdultDark AdaptationFundus OculiHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38112496
PMCPMC10732091
OpenAlexW4389978743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.