Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38112455›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied biomedicine2023

Olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) and trigeminal event-related potentials (TERPs) - a pilot study in Czech participants with normal sense of smell.

Richard Holy, Karla Janouskova, Libor Vasina, Eva Maute, David Kalfert, Kristyna Maminak, Eva Augste, Jiri Hlozek, Helene Schulz, David Funda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostics of olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease - a literature overview and case series.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard HolyMilitary University Hospital Prague, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karla JanouskovaMilitary University Hospital Prague, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic.
Libor VasinaMilitary University Hospital Prague, Department of Neurology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva MauteMaute HNO-Praxis, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm, Germany.
David KalfertUniversity Hospital in Motol, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristyna MaminakMilitary University Hospital Prague, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva AugsteUniversity of Ostrava, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Ostrava-Vitkovice, Czech Republic.
Jiri HlozekMilitary University Hospital Prague, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic.
Helene SchulzCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
David FundaInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, v.v.i., Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaromir AstlMilitary University Hospital Prague, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZMilitary University Hospital Prague · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology · CZHNO-Praxis · DEKlinikum Bremerhaven-Reinkenheide · DE

Funding

Ethics Committee of the Military University Hospital Prague 108/16-24/2021Ethics Committee of the Military University Hospital Prague 108/16-49/2021Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic MO 1012Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic NU 22-09-00493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn recent years, the evaluation of potential events related to olfactory events (OERPs) and trigeminal events (TERPs) has become increasingly important in the diagnosis of olfactory disorders. This technique is increasingly used in basic research and clinical practice to evaluate people suffering from olfactory disorders. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: In a pilot project of the first investigations of OERPs and TERPs in the Czech Republic, we analyse the event-related potentials of the data of normosmic participants.

methodsIn the prospective study, 21 normosmic participants were enrolled for a 2-year period (5/2021-5/2023). OERPs/TERPs were recorded at the scalp vertex (electrode Pz/Cz). Odourants 2-phenylethanol/CO2 were used to selectively activate Nervus olfactorius/ Nervus trigeminus. Brain responses to olfactory/trigeminal stimuli (EEG) were recorded in 21/18 normosmic subjects.

resultsIn the statistical analysis of the olfactory interval N1-P2 (age, gender), we found no statistically significant differences. In the statistical analysis of the trigeminal interval N1-P2 (age, gender) we found statistically significant differences in amplitude by gender (male amplitudes were higher than female amplitudes, p = 0.006).

conclusionOur pilot data can function very well as an internal guide for ongoing and future olfactory research studies. Evaluation of the presence of OERPs appears to be an important parameter for the evaluation of olfactory disorders. The absence of OERPs is a strong indicator of the presence of olfactory dysfunction.

Indexed as

Olfaction DisordersSmellCzech RepublicEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesEvaluation of smellObjective olfactometryOdourantsOlfactory event-related potentialsTrigeminal event-related potentials

Identifiers

PMID38112455
OpenAlexW4389435387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.