ArticleAnnals of surgery2024
An Analysis of 10,000 Cases of Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Japan: Special Reference to the Graft-Versus-Recipient Weight Ratio and Donor Age.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Hemodynamic and Metabolic Stress as Determinants of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Tracheostomy after living donor liver transplantation: the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic significance.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Donor-to-recipient sex match status has no prognostic effect on long-term survival following liver transplantation: a retrospective observational study.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Article
- Adult living-donor liver transplantation without simultaneous splenectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Navigating the risk of living donor liver transplantation from older donors: analysis of 4035 cases from a multicenter cohort.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Prediction of graft loss in living donor liver transplantation during the early postoperative period.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Association Between Distance to the Transplant Center and Survival Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Advocating for a "shift-to-left" in transplant oncology: left grafts, RAPID and dual graft.Updates in surgery · 2025Review
- Indications and recipient outcomes of adult left lobe living donor liver transplantation.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Progress of pediatric liver transplantation: In Japan and beyond.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Graft-to-recipient weight ratio: a timeless standard still shaping outcomes.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- High-volume living donor liver transplantation (LDLT): what the data tells us.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of living donor liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single center prospective study.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2025Article
- Liver transplantation for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastasis: optimal patient selection and perioperative management in the era of multimodal treatments.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze 10,000 cases of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipient data to elucidate outcomes with special reference to the graft-versus-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), based on the Japanese Liver Transplantation Society (JLTS) registry.
backgroundThe JLTS registry has been accurate and complete in characterizing and following trends in patient characteristics and survival of all patients with LDLT.
methodsBetween November 1989 and August 2021, 10,000 patients underwent LDLT in Japan. The procedures performed during the study period included pediatric liver transplantation (age <18 years, n = 3572) and adult liver transplantation (age ≥18 years, n=6428). Factors related to patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) were also analyzed.
resultsThe GRWR was <0.7, 0.7 to <0.8, 0.8 to <3, 3 to <5, and ≥5 in 0.2%, 2.0%, 61.8%, 31.8%, and 2.6% of pediatric patients and <0.6, 0.6 to <0.7, 0.7 to <0.8, and ≥0.8 in 8.0%, 12.7%, 17.7%, and 61.5% of adult patients, respectively. Among pediatric recipients, the PS rate up to 5 years was significantly better in cases with a GRWR ≤5 than in those with a GRWR >5. When the GRWR and donor age were combined, among adult recipients 50 to 60 years old, the early PS and GS up to 5 years were significantly better in cases with a GRWR ≥0.7, than in those with a GRWR <0.7. (P = 0.02). In adults, a multivariate analysis showed that GRWR <0.6, transplant era (<2011), donor age (>60 years), recipient age (>60 years), model for end-stage liver disease score (≥20), and center volume (<10) were significant prognostic factors for long-term PS.
conclusionAlthough a satisfactory long-term PS and GS, especially in the recent era (2011-2021), was achieved in the JLTS series, a GRWR ≥5 in pediatric cases and relatively old donors with a GRWR <0.7 in adult cases should be managed with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38112092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.