Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38112009›Full record

SynthesisPalliative medicine2024

Patient and families' perspectives on telepalliative care: A systematic integrative review.

Eithne Hayes Bauer, Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz, Frans Brandt, Anthony C Smith, Georg Bollig, Karin Brochstedt Dieperink

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eithne Hayes BauerInstitute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2195-5311
Anders Nikolai Ørsted SchultzInstitute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Frans BrandtInstitute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anthony C SmithCentre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Georg BolligHELIOS Klinikum Schleswig, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative Medicine and Pain Therapy, Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
Karin Brochstedt DieperinkFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, Family Focused Healthcare Research Centre (FaCe), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelepalliative care is increasingly used in palliative care, but has yet to be examined from a patient and family perspective. A synthesis of evidence may provide knowledge on how to plan and provide telepalliative care that caters specifically to patients and families' needs.

objectiveTo synthesise evidence on patients and families' perspectives on telepalliative care.

designA systematic integrative review (PROSPERO #CRD42022301206) reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria; primary peer-reviewed studies published 2011-2022, patient and family perspective, >18 years, telepalliative care and English/Danish language. Quality was appraised using the mixed-methods appraisal tool, version 2020. Guided by Toronto and Remington, data were extracted, thematically analysed and synthesised. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched in March 2022 and updated in February 2023.

resultsForty-four studies were included. Analysis revealed five themes; the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on telepalliative care, adding value for patients and families, synchronous and asynchronous telepalliative care, the integration of telepalliative care with other services and the tailoring and timing of telepalliative care.

conclusionEnhanced access to care and convenience, as attributes of telepalliative care, are highly valued. Patients and families have varying needs during the illness trajectory that may be addressed by early integration of telepalliative care based on models of care that are flexible and combine synchronous and asynchronous solutions. Further research should examine telepalliative care in a post-pandemic context, use of models of care and identify meaningful outcome measures from patient and family perspectives for evaluation of telepalliative care.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPandemicsHumansPalliative Carefamilyintegrative review.palliative careTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID38112009
PMCPMC10865769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.