Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38111938›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2023

Peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation at the crossroads of peripapillary myopic changes.

Adèle Ehongo, Zaki Hasnaoui, Nacima Kisma, Yassir Alaoui Mhammedi, Artemise Dugauquier, Kevin Coppens, Eloïse Wellens, Viviane de Maertelaere, Françoise Bremer, Karelle Leroy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cavity in disguise.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adèle EhongoHôpital Erasme, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Zaki HasnaouiHôpital Erasme, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Nacima KismaHôpital Erasme, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Yassir Alaoui MhammediHôpital Erasme, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Artemise DugauquierHôpital Erasme, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Kevin CoppensCosma Consulting Sijsjesdreef 13, Enghien 7850, Belgium.
Eloïse WellensUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Viviane de MaertelaereBiostatistics, IRIBHM Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Françoise BremerHôpital Erasme, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Karelle LeroyLaboratory of Histology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Erasmus Hospital · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyze the prevalence of peripapillary intra-choroidal cavitation (PICC) in eyes with gamma peripapillary atrophy (γPPA), in eyes with peripapillary staphyloma (PPS) and in those combining γPPA and PPS and to analyze border tissue discontinuity in PICC.

methodsThis prospective cross-sectional non interventional study included highly myopic eyes. Non-highly myopic eyes were used as control. Radial and linear scans centered on the optic nerve head were performed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Variables were analyzed along the twelve hourly optical coherence tomography sections in both eyes of each subject.

resultsA total of 667 eyes of 334 subjects were included: 229 (34.3%) highly myopic eyes and 438 (65.7%) non highly myopic eyes. The mean age of the highly myopic group was 48.99±17.81y. PICC was found in a total of 40 eyes and in 13.2% (29/220) of highly myopic eyes. PICC was found in 10.4% (40/386) of eyes with γPPA, in 20.5% (40/195) of eyes with PPS and in 22.7% (40/176) of those combining γPPA and PPS. All the eyes with PICC showed the co-existence of γPPA and PPS whereas none of the eyes presenting only one of these entities exhibited PICC. A border tissue discontinuity in the γPPA area was found in all eyes with PICC.

conclusionWe confirm the presence of a border tissue discontinuity in the γPPA area of all eyes with PICC. These findings suggest the involvement of mechanical factors in the pathogenesis of PICC which may contribute to PICC-related visual field defects.

Indexed as

border tissuegamma peripapillary atrophymyopiamyopic complicationsperipapillary intrachoroidal cavitationperipapillary staphyloma

Identifiers

PMID38111938
PMCPMC10700091
OpenAlexW4388960068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.