ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2023
Surgical outcome comparisons of multifocal IOLs of Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15 and Tecnis Eyhance DIB00V.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of defocus curves of monofocal, enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus IOLs.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Ocular biometric parameters associated with the performance of actual near-add power in multifocal intraocular lenses.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare the surgical outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL; Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15) with those of an enhanced monofocal IOL (Tecnis Eyhance DIB00V).
methodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent cataract surgery with LS-313 MF15 or Eyhance IOL implantation. Data regarding patient demographics, surgical records, and ophthalmic examination before the cataract surgery and one and three months postoperatively were collected. Visual acuities, refractive values, defocus curves, contrast sensitivities and subjective symptoms were evaluated.
resultsAmong the 71 eyes (47 patients) included in this study, 32 eyes (20 patients) underwent LS-313 MF15 IOL implantation, and 39 eyes (27 patients) underwent Eyhance IOL implantation. No significant differences were observed in age, axial length, or refractive error between the two groups preoperatively. Furthermore, the distance-corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuities one month postoperatively did not differ between the groups, and both groups had sufficient visual acuities at the distances of 5, 1 m, 70, 50, and 30 cm. Other ophthalmic data, including subjective symptoms based on the 14-item Visual Function Index Questionnaire, monocular defocus curves, contrast sensitivities, and halo and glare, did not differ between the groups three months postoperatively. Moreover, both groups had good outcomes. The spherical equivalent one month postoperatively was significantly myopic in the LS-313 MF15 group compared with that in the Eyhance group (
conclusionComparison of the surgical outcomes of LS-313 MF15 with those of Eyhance with different optical properties reveal that both IOLs show good postoperative outcomes, with no significant differences being noted between the two IOLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.