Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38111847›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2023

Nanoclay-Doped Electrospun Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering: Investigation on the Structural Modifications in Physiological Environment.

Dalila Miele, Marco Ruggeri, Barbara Vigani, Cesar Viseras, Francesca Natali, Elena Del Favero, Silvia Rossi, Giuseppina Sandri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dalila MieleDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Marco RuggeriDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Barbara ViganiDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Cesar ViserasDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Francesca NataliInstitut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France.
Elena Del FaveroDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milano, Segrate Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6584-1869
Silvia RossiDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9511-3857
Giuseppina SandriDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITInstitut Laue-Langevin · FRUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clay minerals are nanomaterials that have recently been recognized as enabling excipients that can promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. When nanoclays are loaded in a 3D polymeric nanostructure, the cell-substrate interaction is enhanced, and other bioactive properties are optimized. Purpose: In this study, hectorite (HEC)- and montmorillonite (MMT)-doped polymeric scaffolds were explored for the treatment of deep and chronic skin lesions. Methods: Scaffolds were manufactured by means of electrospinning and then crosslinked by heating. Physicochemical analyses were correlated with in vitro biopharmaceutical characterization to predict the in vivo fate of the clay-doped scaffolds. Results and Discussion: The addition of MMT or HEC to the polymeric scaffold framework modifies the surface arrangement and, consequently, the potential of the scaffolds to interact with biological proteins. The presence of nanoclays alters the nanofiber morphology and size, and MMT doping increases wettability and protein adhesion. This has an impact on fibroblast behavior in a shorter time since scaffold stiffness facilitates cell adhesion and cell proliferation. Conclusion: MMT proved to perform better than HEC, and this could be related to its higher hydrophilicity and protein adhesion.

Indexed as

NanofibersTissue EngineeringCell AdhesionCell ProliferationClayPolyestersTissue ScaffoldsClayPolyesterschitosanelectrospinninghectoritemontmorillonitenanofibersnanomaterialstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38111847
PMCPMC10726802
OpenAlexW4389765998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.